These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10368473)

  • 1. Effects of obstetrician characteristics on cesarean delivery rates. A community hospital experience.
    Poma PA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 180(6 Pt 1):1364-72. PubMed ID: 10368473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Obstetrician call schedule and obstetric outcomes among women eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean.
    Yee LM; Liu LY; Grobman WA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):75.e1-75.e6. PubMed ID: 27589899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obstetricians' perspectives on trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) under the two-child policy in China: a cross-sectional study.
    Luo ZC; Liu X; Wang A; Li JQ; Zheng ZH; Guiyu S; Lou T; Pang J; Bai XL
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jan; 21(1):89. PubMed ID: 33509100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cesarean section rates in low-risk private patients managed by certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians.
    Davis LG; Riedmann GL; Sapiro M; Minogue JP; Kazer RR
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1994; 39(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 8027851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chinese obstetricians' attitudes, beliefs, and clinical practices related to cesarean delivery on maternal request.
    Sun N; Yin X; Qiu L; Yang Q; Gong Y
    Women Birth; 2020 Feb; 33(1):e67-e71. PubMed ID: 30935772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practice variations between family physicians and obstetricians in the management of low-risk pregnancies.
    Hueston WJ; Applegate JA; Mansfield CJ; King DE; McClaflin RR
    J Fam Pract; 1995 Apr; 40(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 7699347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physician cesarean delivery rates and risk-adjusted perinatal outcomes.
    Li T; Rhoads GG; Smulian J; Demissie K; Wartenberg D; Kruse L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 101(6):1204-12. PubMed ID: 12798526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of departmental policies on cesarean delivery rates: a community hospital experience.
    Poma PA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 91(6):1013-8. PubMed ID: 9611015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.
    Goyert GL; Bottoms SF; Treadwell MC; Nehra PC
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Mar; 320(11):706-9. PubMed ID: 2922015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lowering the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: comparison of individual physicians' rates, risk factors, and outcomes.
    Lagrew DC; Adashek JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1207-14. PubMed ID: 9662303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of the obstetrician in the relationship between epidural analgesia and cesarean section for dystocia.
    Segal S; Blatman R; Doble M; Datta S
    Anesthesiology; 1999 Jul; 91(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 10422933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in Israel: Maternity department policies and obstetricians' perspectives.
    Hirsh-Yechezkel G; Glasser S; Farhi A; Levitan G; Shachar Y; Zaslavsky-Paltiel I; Boyko V; Ezra Y; Lerner-Geva L
    Womens Health (Lond); 2022; 18():17455057221125366. PubMed ID: 36366970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association Between Senior Obstetrician Supervision of Resident Deliveries and Mode of Delivery.
    Bardos J; Loudon H; Rekawek P; Friedman F; Brodman M; Fox NS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 129(3):486-490. PubMed ID: 28178064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in maternal characteristics and obstetric practice and recent increases in primary cesarean delivery.
    Joseph KS; Young DC; Dodds L; O'Connell CM; Allen VM; Chandra S; Allen AC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 102(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 14551010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey.
    Bergholt T; Østberg B; Legarth J; Weber T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Mar; 83(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 14995922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vanishing forceps delivery.
    Poma PA
    Am J Perinatol; 1999; 16(5):227-31. PubMed ID: 10535615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variation in primary cesarean delivery rates by individual physician within a single-hospital laborist model.
    Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Gilbert SAB; Doyle R; Tong A; Carey JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):531.e1-531.e6. PubMed ID: 26922481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Planned home births: the need for additional contraindications.
    Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Sapra KJ; Arabin B; Chervenak FA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):401.e1-401.e8. PubMed ID: 28153656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hospital-Level Variation in the Frequency of Cesarean Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Who Undergo Labor Induction.
    Main EK; Chang SC; Cheng YW; Rosenstein MG; Lagrew DC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 136(6):1179-1189. PubMed ID: 33156193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A national confidential survey of obstetrician's personal preferences regarding mode of delivery.
    Mc Gurgan P; Coulter-Smith S; O' Donovan PJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2001 Jul; 97(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11435001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.