These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10368608)

  • 1. [The restoration of premolars and molars with titanium pin inserts with composite coatings].
    Astashina NV; Rogozhnikov GI; Kazakov SV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1999; 78(3):42. PubMed ID: 10368608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pins, dowels, and other retentive devices in posterior teeth.
    Jacobi R; Shillingburg HT
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):367-90. PubMed ID: 8348992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin.
    Mohammadi N; Kahnamoii MA; Yeganeh PK; Navimipour EJ
    J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1428-32. PubMed ID: 19801245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture strength of different core build-up designs.
    Bolhuis HPB ; De Gee AJ; Feilzer AJ; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 11803991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compressive shear strength of core materials and restoring techniques.
    Sahmali SM; Saygili G
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Jun; 20(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 11203569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct cores for vital teeth--materials and methods used to retain cores in vital teeth.
    Wilson PH; Fisher NL; Bartlett DW
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 12526272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture resistance of four core materials with incorporated pins.
    Kao EC; Hart S; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 2701071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars.
    Bolhuis P; de Gee A; Feilzer A
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Sep; 35(8):657-67. PubMed ID: 15366533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Placement of fiber prefabricated or custom made posts affects the 3-year survival of endodontically treated premolars.
    Cagidiaco MC; García-Godoy F; Vichi A; Grandini S; Goracci C; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 18686771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored by different FRC posts: an in vitro study.
    Torabi K; Fattahi F
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 19884709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Build-up using composite resins in the root canal therapy of molars and premolars].
    Søbye PE
    Tidsskr Tandlaeger; 1981 Dec; 1(3):30-2. PubMed ID: 6750839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel post-and-core restoration system--results of three years of clinical application of the "Wuerzburg Post".
    Rottner K; Boldt J; Proff P; Spassov A; Gredes T; Mack F; Richter EJ
    J Physiol Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 59 Suppl 5():105-15. PubMed ID: 19075331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resistance of composite and amalgam core foundations retained with and without pins and bonding agents.
    Imbery TA; Swigert R; Richman B; Sawicki V; Pace L; Moon PC
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):130-7; quiz 138-9. PubMed ID: 20236921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gaining crown or bridge retention. An alternative to surgical crown lengthening.
    Moody S
    Dent Today; 2002 Nov; 21(11):122-3. PubMed ID: 12483938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts.
    Naumann M; Preuss A; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 16464492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Use of stump pin inserts in premolar and molar crown destruction].
    Saaksian ShKh
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1987; 66(3):64-5. PubMed ID: 3303459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Survival of ceramic computer-aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry.
    Bindl A; Richter B; Mörmann WH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 15945309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aesthetic efficiency in a post-and-core system.
    Radz GM
    Dent Today; 2010 Jul; 29(7):124-6. PubMed ID: 20687439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro fracture behavior of maxillary premolars with metal crowns and several post-and-core systems.
    Fokkinga WA; Kreulen CM; Le Bell-Rönnlöf AM; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK; Creugers NH
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Jun; 114(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 16776775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pin-retained restorations for severely worn posterior teeth.
    Williamson R
    Compendium; 1993 Nov; 14(11):1412, 1414, 1416 passim; quiz 1422. PubMed ID: 8620378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.