These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10369090)

  • 1. Prehension with the ipsilesional hand after unilateral brain damage.
    Hermsdörfer J; Ulrich S; Marquardt C; Goldenberg G; Mai N
    Cortex; 1999 Apr; 35(2):139-61. PubMed ID: 10369090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ipsilesional deficits during fast diadochokinetic hand movements following unilateral brain damage.
    Hermsdörfer J; Goldenberg G
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(12):2100-15. PubMed ID: 12208006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of unilateral brain damage on grip selection, coordination, and kinematics of ipsilesional prehension.
    Hermsdörfer J; Laimgruber K; Kerkhoff G; Mai N; Goldenberg G
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 Sep; 128(1-2):41-51. PubMed ID: 10473738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Manual and hemispheric asymmetries in the execution of actual and pantomimed prehension.
    Laimgruber K; Goldenberg G; Hermsdörfer J
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(5):682-92. PubMed ID: 15721181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Manual asymmetries in grasp pre-shaping and transport-grasp coordination.
    Tretriluxana J; Gordon J; Winstein CJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 188(2):305-15. PubMed ID: 18437369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic study.
    Grosskopf A; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):230-40. PubMed ID: 16078023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An analysis of spatiotemporal variability during prehension movements: effects of object size and distance.
    Kudoh N; Hattori M; Numata N; Maruyama K
    Exp Brain Res; 1997 Dec; 117(3):457-64. PubMed ID: 9438714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Grip reorganization during wrist transport: the influence of an altered aperture.
    Saling M; Mescheriakov S; Molokanova E; Stelmach GE; Berger M
    Exp Brain Res; 1996 Mar; 108(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 8801129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. The effects of changing object size.
    Paulignan Y; Jeannerod M; MacKenzie C; Marteniuk R
    Exp Brain Res; 1991; 87(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 1769391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A model of the coupling between grip aperture and hand transport during human prehension.
    Hu Y; Osu R; Okada M; Goodale MA; Kawato M
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 167(2):301-4. PubMed ID: 16217646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of speed manipulation on the control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements.
    Rand MK; Squire LM; Stelmach GE
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 174(1):74-85. PubMed ID: 16565810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Control of prehension in hemiparetic cerebral palsy: similarities and differences between the ipsi- and contra-lesional sides of the body.
    Steenbergen B; van der Kamp J
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2004 May; 46(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 15132263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of unilateral brain damage on anticipatory grip force scaling when lifting everyday objects.
    Eidenmüller S; Randerath J; Goldenberg G; Li Y; Hermsdörfer J
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Aug; 61():222-34. PubMed ID: 24978304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Online kinematic regulation by visual feedback for grasp versus transport during reach-to-pinch.
    Nataraj R; Pasluosta C; Li ZM
    Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Aug; 36():134-53. PubMed ID: 24968371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different constraints on grip selection in brain-damaged patients: object use versus object transport.
    Osiurak F; Aubin G; Allain P; Jarry C; Etcharry-Bouyx F; Richard I; Le Gall D
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(9):2431-4. PubMed ID: 18462765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The dependence of ipsilesional aiming deficits on task demands, lesioned hemisphere, and apraxia.
    Hermsdörfer J; Blankenfeld H; Goldenberg G
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(12):1628-43. PubMed ID: 12887988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal control of the reach and grip components during a prehension task in humans.
    Timmann D; Stelmach GE; Bloedel JR
    Neurosci Lett; 1996 Mar; 207(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 8731439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Earlier and greater hand pre-shaping in the elderly: a study based on kinematic analysis of reaching movements to grasp objects.
    Tamaru Y; Naito Y; Nishikawa T
    Psychogeriatrics; 2017 Nov; 17(6):382-388. PubMed ID: 28295921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements.
    Desmurget M; Prablanc C; Arzi M; Rossetti Y; Paulignan Y; Urquizar C
    Exp Brain Res; 1996 Jul; 110(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 8836690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Don't think twice, it's all right--contralesional dependency for bimanual prehension movements.
    Punt TD; Riddoch MJ; Humphreys GW
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(11):1547-58. PubMed ID: 16009237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.