100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10369166)
1. Testing the nonrandomness of chromosomal breakpoints using highest observed breakages.
Hou CD; Chiang J; Tai JJ
Hum Genet; 1999 Apr; 104(4):350-5. PubMed ID: 10369166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A method for testing the nonrandomness of chromosomal breakpoints.
Tai JJ; Hou CD; Wang-Wuu S; Wang CH; Leu SY; Wuu KD
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1993; 63(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 8485989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identifying chromosomal fragile sites from a hierarchical-clustering point of view.
Hou CD; Chiang J; Tai JJ
Biometrics; 2001 Jun; 57(2):435-40. PubMed ID: 11414567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Probability models and the applicability of statistical procedures in the identification of chromosomal fragile sites.
Dahm PF; Olmsted AW; Greenbaum IF
Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):1028-31; discussion 1032-3. PubMed ID: 12495159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A cytogenic study on colorectal carcinoma].
Wang B; Yin P; Kong L
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Aug; 26(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 10072867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chromosomal instability in chronic myeloid leukemia: Philadelphia breakpoints are irrespective to spontaneous breakage and fragile sites.
Fundia AF; Acevedo SH; Larripa IB
Haematologica; 2000 Oct; 85(10):1104-6. PubMed ID: 11025611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A 350-kb cosmid contig in 3p14.2 that crosses the t(3;8) hereditary renal cell carcinoma translocation breakpoint and 17 aphidicolin-induced FRA3B breakpoints.
Paradee W; Wilke CM; Wang L; Shridhar R; Mullins CM; Hoge A; Glover TW; Smith DI
Genomics; 1996 Jul; 35(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 8661108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breakpoint distribution in constitutional chromosome rearrangements with respect to fragile sites.
Porfirio B; Dallapiccola B; Terrenato L
Ann Hum Genet; 1987 Oct; 51(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 3447515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimum sample sizes for identifying chromosomal fragile sites from individuals: Monte Carlo estimation.
Greenbaum IF; Fulton JK; White ED; Dahm PF
Hum Genet; 1997 Nov; 101(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 9385380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Translocations of chromosome 12. II. A comparison of the distribution of sites of spontaneous and induced breakages.
Ford JH
Hum Genet; 1981; 58(3):279-81. PubMed ID: 7327548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cartographic study: breakpoints in 1574 families carrying human reciprocal translocations.
Cohen O; Cans C; Cuillel M; Gilardi JL; Roth H; Mermet MA; Jalbert P; Demongeot J
Hum Genet; 1996 May; 97(5):659-67. PubMed ID: 8655149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifying chromosomal fragile sites from individuals: a multinomial statistical model.
Böhm U; Dahm PF; McAllister BF; Greenbaum IF
Hum Genet; 1995 Mar; 95(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 7868115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chromosomal expression and localization of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites in the standard karyotype of river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis).
Nicodemo D; Coppola G; Pauciullo A; Cosenza G; Ramunno L; Ciotola F; Peretti V; Di Meo GP; Iannuzzi L; Rubes J; Di Berardino D
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2008; 120(1-2):178-82. PubMed ID: 18467845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Karyotypic anomalies and chromosomal sites of increased fragility in colorectal cancer].
Sokova OI; Kirichenko OP; Kulagina OE; Konstantinova LN; Chebotarev AN; Fleĭshman EV
Genetika; 1997 Sep; 33(9):1297-302. PubMed ID: 9445823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Common fragile sites as targets for chromosome rearrangements.
Arlt MF; Durkin SG; Ragland RL; Glover TW
DNA Repair (Amst); 2006 Sep; 5(9-10):1126-35. PubMed ID: 16807141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aphidicolin-induced FRA3B breakpoints cluster in two distinct regions.
Wang L; Paradee W; Mullins C; Shridhar R; Rosati R; Wilke CM; Glover TW; Smith DI
Genomics; 1997 May; 41(3):485-8. PubMed ID: 9169152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The determination of chromosome fragile sites in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with colorectal cancer taking into account the cancer pathology predisposition in the familial anamnesis].
Nesina IP; Polishchuk LZ; Oliĭnichenko PI
Tsitol Genet; 2000; 34(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 10808535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reconsideration of the binomial and F distribution relationship as a test for nonrandomness of chromosomal breakage.
Dahm PF; Greenbaum IF
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1994; 66(3):214-5. PubMed ID: 8125020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fragile sites and breakpoints in constitutional rearrangements and in human sperm chromosomes.
Fuster C; Miró R; Templado C; Barrios L; Moreno V; Egozcue J
Hum Genet; 1989 Jul; 82(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 2737665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preferential integration of marker DNA into the chromosomal fragile site at 3p14: an approach to cloning fragile sites.
Rassool FV; McKeithan TW; Neilly ME; van Melle E; Espinosa R; Le Beau MM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1991 Aug; 88(15):6657-61. PubMed ID: 1862089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
