210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10369532)
1. The grant application: making yours stand out across the review cycle.
Hurley AC; Wells N
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1999; 13 Suppl 1():S120-2. PubMed ID: 10369532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Idea to application: you are in charge.
Wells N; Hurley AC
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1999; 13 Suppl 1():S111-6. PubMed ID: 10369530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sources and means of acquiring grant support for selected projects.
Frels L
AANA J; 1992 Aug; 60(4):362-4. PubMed ID: 1523950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Writing the grant proposal.
Frels L
AANA J; 1993 Feb; 61(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 8368055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications.
Mayo NE; Brophy J; Goldberg MS; Klein MB; Miller S; Platt RW; Ritchie J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 16828678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Peer review in requests for subsidy].
Jennekens FG; Busch HF
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 Mar; 141(13):643-4. PubMed ID: 9190541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structure and process of federal funding for AD research.
Wells N; Hurley AC
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1999; 13 Suppl 1():S117-9. PubMed ID: 10369531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grant reviews: how to do them well.
Koop PM
Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 10703294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a successful research grant application.
Woodward DK; Clifton GD
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Mar; 51(6):813-22. PubMed ID: 8010324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Successful grant writing.
Koppelman GH; Holloway JW
Paediatr Respir Rev; 2012 Mar; 13(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 22208796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to apply for research grants in allergology.
Guillen-Grima F; Annan JW; Alvarez JM; Gómez JM; Ontoso EA;
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 2009; 37(3):146-54. PubMed ID: 19769848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review of nursing research proposals.
Lindquist RD; Tracy MF; Treat-Jacobson D
Am J Crit Care; 1995 Jan; 4(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7894558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of cardiovascular grant-in-aid applications by peer review: influence of internal and external reviewers and committees.
Hodgson C
Can J Cardiol; 1995 Nov; 11(10):864-8. PubMed ID: 7489524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. American Idol and NIH grant review--redux.
Munger K
Cell; 2006 Nov; 127(4):661-2; author reply 664-5. PubMed ID: 17110320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Gender differences in research grant applications for pediatric residents.
Gordon MB; Osganian SK; Emans SJ; Lovejoy FH
Pediatrics; 2009 Aug; 124(2):e355-61. PubMed ID: 19581267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How to increase your funding chances: common pitfalls in medical grant applications.
Koren G
Can J Clin Pharmacol; 2005; 12(2):e182-5. PubMed ID: 16055939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning to lead.
Aschwanden C
Cell; 2006 May; 125(3):407-9. PubMed ID: 16678082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expressing our inner thoughts: how to organize and write a clinical research project grant application.
Koopman WJ
J Rheumatol Suppl; 1992 Apr; 33():16-9. PubMed ID: 1593596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost of the NSERC Science Grant Peer Review System exceeds the cost of giving every qualified researcher a baseline grant.
Gordon R; Poulin BJ
Account Res; 2009; 16(1):13-40. PubMed ID: 19247851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
Insall R
Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
