These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10369819)
1. Ipsilesional neglect: behavioural and anatomical features. Kim M; Na DL; Kim GM; Adair JC; Lee KH; Heilman KM J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1999 Jul; 67(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 10369819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dissociation of sensory-attentional from motor-intentional neglect. Na DL; Adair JC; Williamson DJ; Schwartz RL; Haws B; Heilman KM J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1998 Mar; 64(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 9527144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ipsilesional intentional neglect and the effect of cueing. Schwartz RL; Barrett AM; Kim M; Heilman KM Neurology; 1999 Dec; 53(9):2017-22. PubMed ID: 10599774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Ipsilesional neglect: Behavioral and anatomical correlates": Correction to Sacchetti et al. (2014). Neuropsychology; 2015 Mar; 29(2):182. PubMed ID: 25285520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of primary and secondary influences on spatial neglect. Adair JC; Na DL; Schwartz RL; Heilman KM Brain Cogn; 1998 Aug; 37(3):351-67. PubMed ID: 9733554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ipsilesional 'where' with contralesional 'what' neglect. Kwon JC; Ahn S; Kim S; Heilman KM Neurocase; 2012; 18(5):415-23. PubMed ID: 22136591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field? Snow JC; Mattingley JB Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How many forms of perseveration? Evidence from cancellation tasks in right hemisphere patients. Gandola M; Toraldo A; Invernizzi P; Corrado L; Sberna M; Santilli I; Bottini G; Paulesu E Neuropsychologia; 2013 Dec; 51(14):2960-75. PubMed ID: 24200919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Character-line Bisection Task: a new test for hemispatial neglect. Lee BH; Kang SJ; Park JM; Son Y; Lee KH; Adair JC; Heilman KM; Na DL Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(12):1715-24. PubMed ID: 15327939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A mathematical model of line bisection behaviour in neglect. Anderson B Brain; 1996 Jun; 119 ( Pt 3)():841-50. PubMed ID: 8673496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects. Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How to assess spatial neglect--line bisection or cancellation tasks? Ferber S; Karnath HO J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Oct; 23(5):599-607. PubMed ID: 11778637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ipsilateral neglect from a subcortical lesion: effects of spatial position, distractors, and repeated trials. Harciarek M; Williamson JB; Burtis B; Haque S; Heilman KM Cogn Behav Neurol; 2012 Mar; 25(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 22310307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neglect in elderly stroke patients: a comparison of five tests. Agrell BM; Dehlin OI; Dahlgren CJ Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 1997 Oct; 51(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 9413876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of prismatic adaptation on spatial gradients in unilateral neglect: A comparison of visual and auditory target detection with central attentional load. Eramudugolla R; Boyce A; Irvine DR; Mattingley JB Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2681-92. PubMed ID: 20478321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]