238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10371000)
21. A one-year clinical evaluation of a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement in primary molars.
Yilmaz Y; Eyuboglu O; Kocogullari ME; Belduz N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Feb; 7(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 16491149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of the clinical behavior of resin modified glass ionomer cement on primary molars: a comparative one-year study.
Prabhakar AR; Raju OS; Kurthukoti AJ; Satish V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 18264535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Resin-modified glass-ionomer restoration of primary molars with proximating Class II caries lesions.
Croll TP; Berg JH
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Jul; 28(7):372-6; quiz 377, 386. PubMed ID: 17687899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition.
Wendt LK; Koch G; Birkhed D
Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(4):149-55. PubMed ID: 9850557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surface texture and enamel-restoration interface of glass ionomer restorations.
Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Oray H
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 9484132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of conventional versus colored compomers for class II restorations in primary molars: a 12-month clinical study.
Ertugrul F; Cogulu D; Ozdemir Y; Ersin N
Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 20134179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of cavity form on the durability of glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth: a three-year clinical evaluation.
Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW; Stenberg R
ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 7560366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of glass polyalkenoate restorations in primary molar teeth.
Attwood D; Reid JS; Evans D
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Jun; 2(4):183-5. PubMed ID: 8603144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.
Qvist V; Manscher E; Teglers PT
J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 15053911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars.
Papathanasiou AG; Curzon ME; Fairpo CG
Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 7937261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
Hübel S; Mejàre I
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Brackett MG
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11203770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Vitremer restorative cement for children: three clinicians' observations in three pediatric dental practices.
Croll TP; Helpin ML; Donly KJ
ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(6):391-8, 374. PubMed ID: 11204061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
