483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10371427)
1. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Class II treatment by cephalometric regional superpositions versus conventional measurements.
Efstratiadis S; Baumrind S; Shofer F; Jacobsson-Hunt U; Laster L; Ghafari J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):607-18. PubMed ID: 16286208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of orthodontic treatment on mandibular rotation and displacement in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions.
Phan XL; Schneider BJ; Sadowsky C; BeGole EA
Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 15132443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions.
Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 11298314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Craniofacial morphology and adolescent facial growth in Pierre Robin sequence.
Suri S; Ross RB; Tompson BD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):763-74. PubMed ID: 20685531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of the cranial base angle and its components with other dental/skeletal variables and treatment time.
Andria LM; Leite LP; Prevatte TM; King LB
Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15264648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in mandibular position in treated Class II division 2 malocclusions in growing and non-growing subjects.
AL-Nimri K; Abo-Zomor M; Alomari S
Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 27468594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Class II malocclusion with maxillary protrusion from the deciduous through the mixed dentition: a longitudinal study.
Antonini A; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Franchi L; Defraia E
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 16448241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class II malocclusions between early mixed and permanent dentitions.
Lux CJ; Conradt C; Burden D; Komposch G
Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):674-85. PubMed ID: 14719732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
Stahl F; Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 18617112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment.
Kim KR; Muhl ZF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 11343025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maintenance of a deep bite prior to surgical mandibular advancement.
de Coul FO; Oosterkamp BC; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Pruim GJ; Sandham A
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19737779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Craniofacial changes in Icelandic children between 6 and 16 years of age - a longitudinal study.
Thordarson A; Johannsdottir B; Magnusson TE
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):152-65. PubMed ID: 16230326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of the centroid method of occlusion for studying the vertical and horizontal relationship of the mandible and maxilla.
Murata S
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 17873144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Geometric morphometric assessment of treatment effects of maxillary protraction combined with chin cup appliance on the maxillofacial complex.
Chang HP; Lin HC; Liu PH; Chang CH
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):720-8. PubMed ID: 16159349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cephalometric evaluation of nongrowing females with skeletal and dental Class II, division 1 malocclusion.
Sayin MO; Türkkahraman H
Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):656-60. PubMed ID: 16097237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
