BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10371428)

  • 1. Comparison of preferences in lip position using computer animated imaging.
    Hier LA; Evans CA; BeGole EA; Giddon DB
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 10371428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facial profile preferences among various layers of Turkish population.
    Türkkahraman H; Gökalp H
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):640-7. PubMed ID: 15529499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of chin prominence on esthetic lip profile preferences.
    Coleman GG; Lindauer SJ; Tüfekçi E; Shroff B; Best AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 17628248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of well-balanced lip position by Japanese orthodontic patients.
    Shimomura T; Ioi H; Nakata S; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):e291-7. PubMed ID: 21457834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of lip position preferences in a Saudi population using computer imaging.
    Al Abdulwahhab B; Pani S; Al Khunaizi R; Al Faraj N
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2013; 8(3):444-52. PubMed ID: 23957043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Angular asymmetries of the human face.
    Namano S; Behrend DA; Harcourt JK; Wilson PR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11203607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The perception of children's computer-imaged facial profiles by patients, mothers and clinicians.
    Miner RM; Anderson NK; Evans CA; Giddon DB
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):1034-9. PubMed ID: 18004912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the effects of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment on self-esteem in an adolescent population.
    Jung MH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20691357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic smile analysis: changes with age.
    Desai S; Upadhyay M; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):310.e1-10; discussion 310-1. PubMed ID: 19732654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.
    Stephens CK; Boley JC; Behrents RG; Alexander RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 16214626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of lip form on incisal display with lips in repose on the esthetic preferences of dentists and lay people.
    Kim J; Topolski R; Dickinson D; Ramos V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):413-421. PubMed ID: 28222885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-animated comparison of self-perception with actual profiles of orthodontic and nonorthodontic subjects.
    Kitay D; BeGole EA; Evans CA; Giddon DB
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 10686835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reliability of analytical reference lines for determining esthetically pleasing lip position: An assessment of consistency, sensitivity, and specificity.
    Ng JHH; Singh P; Wang Z; Yang Y; Khambay BS; Gu M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Jul; 164(1):e14-e26. PubMed ID: 37227323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences.
    Giddon DB; Sconzo R; Kinchen JA; Evans CA
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(6):441-8. PubMed ID: 8974180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental esthetic self-perception in young adults with and without previous orthodontic treatment.
    Bernabé E; Kresevic VD; Cabrejos SC; Flores-Mir F; Flores-Mir C
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):412-6. PubMed ID: 16637720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epidemiology of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need of 12-13-year-old Malaysian schoolchildren.
    Esa R; Razak IA; Allister JH
    Community Dent Health; 2001 Mar; 18(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 11421403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile.
    Nanda RS; Meng H; Kapila S; Goorhuis J
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 2389850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored Japanese facial profiles.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 16102406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.