213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10371920)
1. Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: a review of the literature.
Wee AG; Aquilino SA; Schneider RL
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 10371920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant verification cast--a predictable restorative system in implant prosthodontics.
Simon H; Marchack CB
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2010 Aug; 38(8):571-81. PubMed ID: 20853729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Photogrammetry--an alternative to conventional impressions in implant dentistry? A clinical pilot study.
Jemt T; Bäck T; Petersson A
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 10635208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of prosthesis fit and the effect of a luting system on the prosthetic connection preload: an in vitro study.
Duyck J; Naert I
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):389-96. PubMed ID: 12170855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving the fit of implant-supported superstructures using the spark erosion technique.
Eisenmann E; Mokabberi A; Walter MH; Freesmeyer WB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):810-8. PubMed ID: 15623055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Description and evaluation of a simplified method to achieve passive fit between cast titanium frameworks and implants.
Helldén LB; Dérand T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 9581404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving implant framework passive fit and accuracy through the use of verification stents and casts.
Schneider A; Kurtzman GM; Silverstein LH
J Dent Technol; 2001 Jun; 18(4):23-5. PubMed ID: 11933718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.
Hecker DM; Eckert SE
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implant treatment in the edentulous jaw.
Jemt T; Bäck T; Petersson A
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 10635187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks.
Al-Fadda SA; Zarb GA; Finer Y
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 17455431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: comparison of gaps at the prosthetic-abutment interface when cycled abutments are replaced with as-manufactured abutments.
Hecker DM; Eckert SE; Choi YG
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16399272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.
Watanabe F; Uno I; Hata Y; Neuendorff G; Kirsch A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 10795453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A method aimed at achieving passive fit in implant prostheses: case report.
Iglesia MA; Moreno J
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):570-4. PubMed ID: 12066705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New techniques in spark erosion: the solution to an accurately fitting screw-retained implant restoration.
Rübeling G
Quintessence Int; 1999 Jan; 30(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 10323157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
Goossens IC; Herbst D
SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
Wise M
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques.
Takahashi T; Gunne J
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 12644800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corrected master cast procedure for intraoral luted implant frameworks.
Lyzak WA
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Apr; 75(4):440-2. PubMed ID: 8642533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
