These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10372188)

  • 1. Impedance mammograph 3D phantom studies.
    Wtorek J; Stelter J; Nowakowski A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1999 Apr; 873():520-33. PubMed ID: 10372188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An image reconstruction algorithm for 3-D electrical impedance mammography.
    Zhang X; Wang W; Sze G; Barber D; Chatwin C
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Dec; 33(12):2223-41. PubMed ID: 25014954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accounting for hardware imperfections in EIT image reconstruction algorithms.
    Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S13-27. PubMed ID: 17664631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A feasibility study of a rotary planar electrode array for electrical impedance mammography using a digital breast phantom.
    Zhang X; Chatwin C; Barber DC
    Physiol Meas; 2015 Jun; 36(6):1311-35. PubMed ID: 26007201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image reconstruction using interval simulated annealing in electrical impedance tomography.
    Martins Tde C; de Camargo ED; Lima RG; Amato MB; Tsuzuki Mde S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Jul; 59(7):1861-70. PubMed ID: 22361655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrical conductivity imaging by magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
    Oh SH; Han JY; Lee SY; Cho MH; Lee BI; Woo EJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2003 Oct; 50(4):875-8. PubMed ID: 14523975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-frequency EIT hardware system based on DSP.
    Zhang S; Xu G; Wu H; Geng D; Yan W
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; Suppl():6677-80. PubMed ID: 17959484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast tomosynthesis: Dosimetry and image quality assessment on phantom.
    Meyblum E; Gardavaud F; Dao TH; Fournier V; Beaussart P; Pigneur F; Baranes L; Rahmouni A; Luciani A
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2015 Sep; 96(9):931-9. PubMed ID: 25908324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An iterative reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis imaging using real data at three radiation doses.
    Polat A; Yildirim I
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 29504549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved image quality in digital mammography with image processing.
    Baydush AH; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1503-8. PubMed ID: 10947253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
    Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multishot echo-planar MREIT for fast imaging of conductivity, current density, and electric field distributions.
    Chauhan M; Vidya Shankar R; Ashok Kumar N; Kodibagkar VD; Sadleir R
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jan; 79(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 28205251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study of computer assisted assessment of image quality index for mammographic phantom images.
    Mayo P; Rodenas F; Verdú G; Villaescusa JI; Campayo JM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 116(1-4 Pt 2):620-3. PubMed ID: 16604712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Static imaging of the electrical impedance tomography on cylinder physical phantom.
    Liu R; Fu F; You F; Shi X; Dong X
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1381-8. PubMed ID: 26405899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of back projection methods for breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction.
    Zhou W; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25384538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unveiling the development of intracranial injury using dynamic brain EIT: an evaluation of current reconstruction algorithms.
    Li H; Chen R; Xu C; Liu B; Tang M; Yang L; Dong X; Fu F
    Physiol Meas; 2017 Aug; 38(9):1776-1790. PubMed ID: 28714853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography spectral imaging algorithm for early stroke detection.
    Yang L; Xu C; Dai M; Fu F; Shi X; Dong X
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Dec; 37(12):2317-2335. PubMed ID: 27897152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of a multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (mfEIT) system KHU Mark1: impedance spectroscopy and time-difference imaging.
    Oh TI; Koo H; Lee KH; Kim SM; Lee J; Kim SW; Seo JK; Woo EJ
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Mar; 29(3):295-307. PubMed ID: 18367806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.