These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10373092)

  • 1. The effect of bonding agents on the microleakage and bond strength of sealant in primary teeth.
    Tulunoğlu O; Bodur H; Uçtaşli M; Alaçam A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 May; 26(5):436-41. PubMed ID: 10373092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of one-bottle adhesive as an intermediate bonding layer to reduce sealant microleakage on saliva-contaminated enamel.
    Hebling J; Feigal RJ
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 11763928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of a bonding agent to reduce sealant sensitivity to moisture contamination: an in vitro study.
    Hitt JC; Feigal RJ
    Pediatr Dent; 1992; 14(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 1502115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of bonding agents on the microleakage of sealant following contamination with saliva.
    Askarizadeh N; Norouzi N; Nemati S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Jun; 26(2):64-6. PubMed ID: 18603730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage and bond strength of sealant to primary enamel comparing air abrasion and acid etch techniques.
    Knobloch LA; Meyer T; Kerby RE; Johnston W
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):463-9. PubMed ID: 16532886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bond strength of a pit-and-fissure sealant associated to etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesive systems to saliva-contaminated enamel: individual vs. simultaneous light curing.
    Gomes-Silva JM; Torres CP; Contente MM; Oliveira MA; Palma-Dibb RG; Borsatto MC
    Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 19180325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of dentin primer on shear bond strength of composite resin to moist and dry enamel.
    Jain P; Stewart GP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 11203791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of composite restorations bonded with three new dentin bonding agents.
    Santini A; Mitchell S
    J Esthet Dent; 1998; 10(6):296-304. PubMed ID: 10321199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro comparison of microleakage of two self-etched adhesive and the one-bottle adhesive used in pit and fissure sealant with or without saliva contamination.
    Bassir L; Khanehmasjedi M; Nasr E; Kaviani A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):806-10. PubMed ID: 23649068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of fissure morphology and pretreatment of the enamel surface on penetration and adhesion of fissure sealants.
    Symons AL; Chu CY; Meyers IA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Dec; 23(12):791-8. PubMed ID: 8971640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shear bond strength and microleakage of new dentin bonding systems.
    Abdalla AI; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1993 Dec; 6(6):295-8. PubMed ID: 7880479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing microleakage of sealants under salivary contamination: digital-image analysis evaluation.
    Borem LM; Feigal RJ
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 8058902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resin-based pit-and-fissure sealants: microleakage reduction and infiltration enhancement using a bonding agent.
    Meller C; Reichenmiller K; Schwahn C; Samietz S; Blunck U
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Feb; 17(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 25625135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The bonding of composite resin to moist enamel.
    Walls AW; Lee J; McCabe JF
    Br Dent J; 2001 Aug; 191(3):148-50. PubMed ID: 11523887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage and penetration ability of resin sealant versus bonding system when applied following contamination.
    Duangthip D; Lussi A
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 14649617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives.
    Fortin D; Swift EJ; Denehy GE; Reinhardt JW
    Dent Mater; 1994 Jul; 10(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 7664993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of bonding agents with wet and dry bonding techniques.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 9002813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.