These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10373860)

  • 1. Reviewing and understanding research reports.
    Whitney JD
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1999 Mar; 26(2):58-9. PubMed ID: 10373860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Critiquing a research article.
    Giuffre M
    J Perianesth Nurs; 1998 Apr; 13(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 9592451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reviewing a manuscript for publication: how do I do this?
    Koop PP
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 10703301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
    Clarke SP
    Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Writing a feature article: not all articles are alike.
    Pelletier LR
    Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(4):7-8. PubMed ID: 14562512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critically evaluating research studies.
    Rogers B
    AAOHN J; 1995 Jan; 43(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 7695808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Grant reviews: how to do them well.
    Koop PM
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 10703294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The "so what" question: the impact of nursing research.
    Mitchell PH
    J Prof Nurs; 2004; 20(6):347-8. PubMed ID: 15599866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review of nursing research proposals.
    Lindquist RD; Tracy MF; Treat-Jacobson D
    Am J Crit Care; 1995 Jan; 4(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7894558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The critique: a necessary part of scientific inquiry.
    Schmelzer M
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2006; 29(4):324-5. PubMed ID: 16974173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revise and resubmit: now what?
    Algase DL
    Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2014; 28(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 25929147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
    Clarke SP
    Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing critical appraisal skills.
    McCaughan D
    Prof Nurse; 1999 Sep; 14(12):843-7. PubMed ID: 10603895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An interview with the editors: by Daniel D. Moos.
    Hooper V; Odom-Forren J
    J Perianesth Nurs; 2010 Feb; 25(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 20159536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Taking note of trends in age groupings.
    Becker PT
    Res Nurs Health; 2010 Dec; 33(6):475-6. PubMed ID: 20890949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the quality of research: a challenge for nursing.
    Luker K
    Nurs Inq; 2007 Mar; 14(1):1. PubMed ID: 17298602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to critique a research study.
    Fosbinder D; Loveridge C
    Adv Pract Nurs Q; 1996; 2(3):68-71. PubMed ID: 9447093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The art of criticism.
    Parse RR
    Nurs Sci Q; 1998; 11(2):43. PubMed ID: 10036454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Getting through the IRB: Covenant Medical Center Nursing Research Committee's experience.
    Butzow M
    J Emerg Nurs; 1995 Jun; 21(3):262-3. PubMed ID: 7630066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thinking both inside and outside the box on measurement articles.
    Froman RD; Schmitt MH
    Res Nurs Health; 2003 Oct; 26(5):335-6. PubMed ID: 14579254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.