408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10374081)
1. Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.
Moher D; Cook DJ; Jadad AR; Tugwell P; Moher M; Jones A; Pham B; Klassen TP
Health Technol Assess; 1999; 3(12):i-iv, 1-98. PubMed ID: 10374081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fables or foibles: inherent problems with RCTs.
Rosner A
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Sep; 26(7):460-7. PubMed ID: 12975633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Consort 2010 statement on randomised controlled trials.
Murphy JF
Ir Med J; 2010 May; 103(5):132. PubMed ID: 20666080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. David Moher, MSc The CONSORT Guidelines: improving the quality of research. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. Interview by Bonnie Horrigan.
Moher D
Altern Ther Health Med; 2002; 8(3):103-8. PubMed ID: 12017485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Critical appraisal. 5. Randomised controlled trials: questions for valid evidence.
Nelson EA
NT Learn Curve; 1999 Jul; 3(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 10795227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group.
Moher D; Cook DJ; Eastwood S; Olkin I; Rennie D; Stroup DF
Br J Surg; 2000 Nov; 87(11):1448-54. PubMed ID: 11091231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement.
Otwombe KN; Ogutu B
East Afr Med J; 2002 Jul; 79(7):394-6. PubMed ID: 12638837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide.
Pai M; McCulloch M; Gorman JD; Pai N; Enanoria W; Kennedy G; Tharyan P; Colford JM
Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 15141602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Larger effect sizes were associated with higher quality ratings in complementary and alternative medicine randomized controlled trials.
Bausell RB; Lee WL; Soeken KL; Li YF; Berman BM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):438-46. PubMed ID: 15196613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.
Turpin DL
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):681-5; discussion 686. PubMed ID: 16360902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
Poolman RW; Struijs PA; Krips R; Sierevelt IN; Lutz KH; Bhandari M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16965628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of reporting in randomized trials.
Sataloff RT
Ear Nose Throat J; 2010 Apr; 89(4):150. PubMed ID: 20397138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Meta-analyses in psychopharmacotherapy: garbage in--garbage out?].
Weinmann S
Psychiatr Prax; 2009 Sep; 36(6):255-7. PubMed ID: 19707997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-analysis as a tool for evidence-based practice: an example using the Rice meta-analysis of smoking cessation interventions.
Leonard EE; Wynd CA
Appl Nurs Res; 2008 Feb; 21(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 18226762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A critical approach to evidence provided through clinical trials.
Shaw S
Nurs Times; 2006 Sep 5-11; 102(36):36-8. PubMed ID: 16986593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomised controlled trials for chronic illness management research - where's the tipping point?
Coates V
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Apr; 17(7B):147-50. PubMed ID: 18578788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.
Walker A; Nixon J
J Wound Care; 2004 Mar; 13(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 15045804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
