These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10374988)

  • 1. Characterization of cavitational activity in lithotripsy fields using a robust electromagnetic probe.
    Pye SD; Dineley JA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Mar; 25(3):451-71. PubMed ID: 10374988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing results of lithotripsy using robust electromagnetic probe.
    Keeley FX; Pye SD; Smith G; Tolley DA
    J Endourol; 1999 May; 13(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 10405903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Controlled, forced collapse of cavitation bubbles for improved stone fragmentation during shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zhong P; Cocks FH; Cioanta I; Preminger GM
    J Urol; 1997 Dec; 158(6):2323-8. PubMed ID: 9366384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inertial cavitation and associated acoustic emission produced during electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zhong P; Cioanta I; Cocks FH; Preminger GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2940-50. PubMed ID: 9165740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of a dual-pulse lithotripter to generate a localized and intensified cavitation field.
    Sokolov DL; Bailey MR; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1685-95. PubMed ID: 11572377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transient oscillation of cavitation bubbles near stone surface during electrohydraulic lithotripsy.
    Zhong P; Tong HL; Cocks FH; Preminger GM
    J Endourol; 1997 Feb; 11(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 9048300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Focused Ultrasound and Lithotripsy.
    Ikeda T; Yoshizawa S; Koizumi N; Mitsuishi M; Matsumoto Y
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 880():113-29. PubMed ID: 26486335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Turbulent water coupling in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Lautz J; Sankin G; Zhong P
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 58(3):735-48. PubMed ID: 23322027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of shock wave pressure amplitude and pulse repetition frequency on the lifespan, size and number of transient cavities in the field of an electromagnetic lithotripter.
    Huber P; Jöchle K; Debus J
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Oct; 43(10):3113-28. PubMed ID: 9814538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suppressing bubble shielding effect in shock wave lithotripsy by low intensity pulsed ultrasound.
    Wang JC; Zhou Y
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Jan; 55():65-74. PubMed ID: 25173067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A dual passive cavitation detector for localized detection of lithotripsy-induced cavitation in vitro.
    Cleveland RO; Sapozhnikov OA; Bailey MR; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1745-58. PubMed ID: 10738826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Control of cavitation activity by different shockwave pulsing regimes.
    Huber P; Debus J; Jöchle K; Simiantonakis I; Jenne J; Rastert R; Spoo J; Lorenz WJ; Wannenmacher M
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Jun; 44(6):1427-37. PubMed ID: 10498515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tandem shock wave cavitation enhancement for extracorporeal lithotripsy.
    Loske AM; Prieto FE; Fernandez F; van Cauwelaert J
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Nov; 47(22):3945-57. PubMed ID: 12476975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter.
    Pishchalnikov YA; McAteer JA; Williams JC; Pishchalnikova IV; Vonderhaar RJ
    J Endourol; 2006 Aug; 20(8):537-41. PubMed ID: 16903810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A suppressor to prevent direct wave-induced cavitation in shock wave therapy devices.
    Matula TJ; Hilmo PR; Bailey MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jul; 118(1):178-85. PubMed ID: 16119340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulation of the effects of cavitation and anatomy in the shock path of model lithotripters.
    Krimmel J; Colonius T; Tanguay M
    Urol Res; 2010 Dec; 38(6):505-18. PubMed ID: 21063697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Importance of the implosion of ESWL-induced cavitation bubbles.
    Delacrétaz G; Rink K; Pittomvils G; Lafaut JP; Vandeursen H; Boving R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 7754583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cavitation cluster dynamics in shock-wave lithotripsy: part 1. Free field.
    Arora M; Junge L; Ohl CD
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 31(6):827-39. PubMed ID: 15936498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamics of bubble oscillation in constrained media and mechanisms of vessel rupture in SWL.
    Zhong P; Zhou Y; Zhu S
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Jan; 27(1):119-34. PubMed ID: 11295278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shock wave-inertial microbubble interaction: a theoretical study based on the Gilmore formulation for bubble dynamics.
    Zhu S; Zhong P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):3024-33. PubMed ID: 10573912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.