These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1037514)

  • 1. Kansas lops $2,600,000 from Blues' rate hikes.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1976 Jan; 30(7):49. PubMed ID: 1037514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kansas Blues to use DRG pay plan.
    Rust ME
    Am Med News; 1983 Jun; 26(23):1, 8-9. PubMed ID: 10310160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Blues' blitz on health care costs.
    Demkovich LE
    Natl J (Wash); 1979 Jun; 11(22):902-6. PubMed ID: 10241583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blues' consumer slant, tougher cost controls, strain hospital relations.
    LaViolette S
    Mod Healthc; 1979 Jun; 9(6):34-6. PubMed ID: 571520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AP criticism of Blue Shield unwarranted.
    Ryan WE
    Hosp Prog; 1975 Nov; 56(11):10-1. PubMed ID: 1183975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. States grudgingly grant Blues rate increases.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1976 Apr; 30(10):35-6. PubMed ID: 1037498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blues' cost-control claims stir debate.
    Cain C
    Bus Insur; 1983 Mar; 17(11):22-24. PubMed ID: 10258967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are you paying for the Blues' new prosperity?
    Hunt K
    Med Econ; 1985 Aug; 62(16):50-5. PubMed ID: 10272459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blues lose interest in state capitation.
    Gallivan M
    Hospitals; 1986 Jul; 60(14):28. PubMed ID: 3721468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blues' president foresees negotiated fee plan. Interview by Sari Staver.
    McNerney WJ
    Am Med News; 1981 Aug; 24(31):3, 19. PubMed ID: 10324158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Huge cost savings foreseen for Blues' two new programs.
    Staver S
    Am Med News; 1980 Jun; 23(24):1, 22-3. PubMed ID: 10247050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How Michigan Blues contain health care costs.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1976 Oct; 31(4):52, 54. PubMed ID: 1037585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Michigan physicians and the Blues - a chronological report of the latest face-off.
    Pearson J
    Mich Med; 1976 Nov; 75(11):614-20, 622, 627-8. PubMed ID: 979674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Loss of tax exemption prompts Blues to review policy prices.
    Richman D
    Mod Healthc; 1987 Jan; 17(2):46, 48. PubMed ID: 10279886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Court upholds Blues' fee discounts.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Sep; 19(35):3. PubMed ID: 10324683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. St. Francis Hospital takes on the Blues.
    Haradine J
    Mich Hosp; 1978 Mar; 14(3):21-2. PubMed ID: 10306418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maryland Blues' proposal criticized.
    Baldwin MF
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Jan; 16(2):18. PubMed ID: 10300559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Blues' reimbursement system.
    Marr J
    Mich Med; 1988 Jul; 87(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 3216806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blues' case management programs win support.
    Sandrick K
    Hospitals; 1987 Sep; 61(18):28, 32. PubMed ID: 3623463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Va. Blues claim $20 million in subscriber savings.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 May; 31(11):47. PubMed ID: 10304792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.