195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10375923)
1. [Colposcopic verification of cytologic smears containing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance].
Pityński K; Basta A; Szczudrawa A; Strama M; Piwowarska E
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 10375923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. HPV DNA testing in the triage of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS): cost comparison of two methods.
Layfield LJ; Qureshi MN
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Aug; 33(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 16007672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS).
Walker JL; Wang SS; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 16890545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Natural history of the minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Montz FJ; Monk BJ; Fowler JM; Nguyen L
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):385-8. PubMed ID: 1495693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear?
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL
J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Significance of human papillomavirus test in triage of patients with atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance].
Zhao J; Zhou JN; Yang YJ; Liao QP
Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 22(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 19105350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term follow-up of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS).
Emerson RE; Puzanov A; Brunnemer C; Younger C; Cramer H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 12203862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colposcopic evaluation of patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
Talebian F; Shayan A; Krumholz BA; Palladino VS; Mann LI
Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jun; 49(6):670-4. PubMed ID: 865729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance qualified: a follow-up study.
Kline MJ; Davey DD
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 8725142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report.
Luesley D; Downey G
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Diagnostic verification of Group III and III D cytological tests with special reference to follow-up].
Schlegel H; Kühndel K
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1983; 105(24):1585-96. PubMed ID: 6666444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The significance of cervical cytologic dysplasia.
Jordan SW; Smith NL; Dike LS
Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 6942614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
Cheng RF; Hernandez E; Anderson LL; Heller PB; Shank R
J Reprod Med; 1999 Nov; 44(11):922-8. PubMed ID: 10589401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Colposcopy and early changes of cervical carcinoma (author's transl)].
Kühndel K; Buchholz W; Jaeckel G
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1981 Apr; 41(4):263-5. PubMed ID: 6908874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of HIV infection on atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Duerr A; Paramsothy P; Jamieson DJ; Heilig CM; Klein RS; Cu-Uvin S; Schuman P; Anderson JR;
Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Mar; 42(6):855-61. PubMed ID: 16477565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colposcopic and Histological Outcome of Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance and Atypical Squamous Cell of Undetermined Significance Cannot Exclude High-Grade in Women Screened for Cervical Cancer.
Ortashi O; Abdalla D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Sep; 20(9):2579-2582. PubMed ID: 31554348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of follow-up of atypical and ASCUS papanicolaou tests in a high-risk population.
McKee MD; Schechter C; Burton W; Mulvihill M
J Fam Pract; 2001 Jul; 50(7):609. PubMed ID: 11485710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atypical squamous cells and low squamous intraepithelial lesions in postmenopausal women: implications for management.
Piccoli R; Mandato VD; Lavitola G; Acunzo G; Bifulco G; Tommaselli GA; Attianese W; Nappi C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Oct; 140(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 18603346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ detected by directed biopsy].
Milojković M; Makarović Z; Pajtler M
Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1989; 29(5-6):198-200. PubMed ID: 2640269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
