These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10378801)

  • 1. Interface between bone and nacre implants in sheep.
    Atlan G; Delattre O; Berland S; LeFaou A; Nabias G; Cot D; Lopez E
    Biomaterials; 1999 Jun; 20(11):1017-22. PubMed ID: 10378801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nacre/bone interface changes in durable nacre endosseous implants in sheep.
    Berland S; Delattre O; Borzeix S; Catonné Y; Lopez E
    Biomaterials; 2005 May; 26(15):2767-73. PubMed ID: 15585281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of organic matrix proteins on the interfacial structure at the bone-biocompatible nacre interface in vitro.
    Kim YW; Kim JJ; Kim YH; Rho JY
    Biomaterials; 2002 May; 23(9):2089-96. PubMed ID: 11996051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tissue responses to natural aragonite (Margaritifera shell) implants in vivo.
    Liao H; Mutvei H; Sjöström M; Hammarström L; Li J
    Biomaterials; 2000 Mar; 21(5):457-68. PubMed ID: 10674810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of bone around titanium implants and bioactive glass particles: an experimental study in rats.
    Gorustovich A; Rosenbusch M; Guglielmotti MB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):644-50. PubMed ID: 12381064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in the extracellular matrix on the surface of sintered bovine bone implanted in the femur of a rabbit: an immunohistochemical study.
    Hashizume H; Tamaki T; Oura H; Minamide A
    J Orthop Sci; 1998; 3(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 9654554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lateral ridge augmentation and implant placement: an experimental study evaluating implant osseointegration in different augmentation materials in the canine mandible.
    von Arx T; Cochran DL; Hermann JS; Schenk RK; Higginbottom FL; Buser D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):343-54. PubMed ID: 11432654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of nacre surface and its modification on bone apposition: a bone development model in rats.
    Bahar H; Yaffe A; Binderman I
    J Periodontol; 2003 Mar; 74(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 12710757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two bone substitute biomaterials consisting of a mixture of fibrin sealant (Tisseel) and MBCP (TricOs) with an autograft in sinus lift surgery in sheep.
    Saffarzadeh A; Gauthier O; Bilban M; Bagot D'Arc M; Daculsi G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1133-9. PubMed ID: 19681969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of bovine-derived bone protein with a natural coral carrier as a bone-graft substitute in a canine segmental defect model.
    Sciadini MF; Dawson JM; Johnson KD
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Nov; 15(6):844-57. PubMed ID: 9497809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design strategies and applications of nacre-based biomaterials.
    Gerhard EM; Wang W; Li C; Guo J; Ozbolat IT; Rahn KM; Armstrong AD; Xia J; Qian G; Yang J
    Acta Biomater; 2017 May; 54():21-34. PubMed ID: 28274766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Injectable calcium phosphate cement as a graft material for maxillary sinus augmentation: an experimental pilot study.
    Aral A; Yalçin S; Karabuda ZC; Anil A; Jansen JA; Mutlu Z
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jun; 19(6):612-7. PubMed ID: 18474064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resolution of surgically created three-wall intrabony defects in implants using three different biomaterials: an in vivo study.
    Choi JY; Jung UW; Lee IS; Kim CS; Lee YK; Choi SH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 20831755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Bone transplantation and bone replacement materials].
    Patka P; Haarman HJ; Bakker FC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Apr; 142(16):893-6. PubMed ID: 9623184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Apatite layer-coated titanium for use as bone bonding implants.
    Yan WQ; Nakamura T; Kawanabe K; Nishigochi S; Oka M; Kokubo T
    Biomaterials; 1997 Sep; 18(17):1185-90. PubMed ID: 9259516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term biocompatibility and osseointegration of electron beam melted, free-form-fabricated solid and porous titanium alloy: experimental studies in sheep.
    Palmquist A; Snis A; Emanuelsson L; Browne M; Thomsen P
    J Biomater Appl; 2013 May; 27(8):1003-16. PubMed ID: 22207608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Osseointegration of Ti6Al4V alloy implants coated with titanium nitride by a new method.
    Sovak G; Weiss A; Gotman I
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Mar; 82(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 10755443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there a role of coral bone substitutes in bone repair?
    Pountos I; Giannoudis PV
    Injury; 2016 Dec; 47(12):2606-2613. PubMed ID: 27836254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of microporosity on osteoinduction of calcium phosphate bone graft substitute biomaterials.
    Chan O; Coathup MJ; Nesbitt A; Ho CY; Hing KA; Buckland T; Campion C; Blunn GW
    Acta Biomater; 2012 Jul; 8(7):2788-94. PubMed ID: 22475784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Back-scattered electron imaging and elemental microanalysis of retrieved bone tissue following maxillary sinus floor augmentation with calcium sulphate.
    Slater N; Dasmah A; Sennerby L; Hallman M; Piattelli A; Sammons R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):814-22. PubMed ID: 18705813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.