These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10379255)

  • 41. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Analysis of a restored maxillary second premolar tooth by using three-dimensional finite element method.
    Toparli M; Gökay N; Aksoy T
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Feb; 26(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 10080314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A mathematical analysis of shrinkage stress development in dental composite restorations during resin polymerization.
    Li J; Li H; Fok SL
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 18191446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Finite element stress analysis of indirect restorations prepared in cavity bases.
    Yamamoto T; Takeishi S; Momoi Y
    Dent Mater J; 2007 Mar; 26(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 17621945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2013 Dec; 29(12):e309-17. PubMed ID: 24157244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of dental restoration geometry and material properties on biomechanical behaviour of a treated molar tooth: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Babaei B; Shouha P; Birman V; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Jan; 125():104892. PubMed ID: 34688146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Equivalent Young's modulus of composite resin for simulation of stress during dental restoration.
    Park JH; Choi NS
    Dent Mater; 2017 Feb; 33(2):e79-e85. PubMed ID: 27866696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Finite element analysis of bonded model Class I 'restorations' after shrinkage.
    Rodrigues FP; Silikas N; Watts DC; Ballester RY
    Dent Mater; 2012 Feb; 28(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 22036589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [A mechanical study on new ceramic crowns and bridges for clinical use].
    Hino T
    Osaka Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1990 Jun; 35(1):240-67. PubMed ID: 2135407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Stress distribution with different restorations in teeth with curved roots: a finite element analysis study.
    Chatvanitkul C; Lertchirakarn V
    J Endod; 2010 Jan; 36(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 20003947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An evaluation of the stresses generated in a bonded orthodontic attachment by three different load cases using the Finite Element Method of stress analysis.
    Knox J; Jones ML; Hubsch P; Middleton J; Kralj B
    J Orthod; 2000 Mar; 27(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 10790443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Transient thermal and stress analysis of maxillary second premolar tooth using an exact three-dimensional model.
    Hashemipour MA; Mohammadpour A; Nassab SA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 20657080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
    Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The new generation of conventional and bulk-fill composites do not reduce the shrinkage stress in endodontically-treated molars.
    Oliveira Schliebe LRS; Lourenço Braga SS; da Silva Pereira RA; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Novais VR; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Am J Dent; 2016 Dec; 29(6):333-338. PubMed ID: 29178721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An evaluation of the influence of orthodontic adhesive on the stresses generated in a bonded bracket finite element model.
    Knox J; Kralj B; Hübsch PF; Middleton J; Jones ML
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 11174539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of differing thickness and mechanical properties of cement on the stress levels and distributions in a three-unit zirconia fixed prosthesis by FEA.
    Wimmer T; Erdelt KJ; Raith S; Schneider JM; Stawarczyk B; Beuer F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):358-66. PubMed ID: 24417273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Virtual prototyping of adhesively restored, endodontically treated molars.
    Magne P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):343-51. PubMed ID: 20493323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.