These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10379298)

  • 1. In vitro study of the retention and mechanical fatigue behavior of four implant overdenture stud-type attachments.
    Fromentin O; Picard B; Tavernier B
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1999 Apr; 11(3):391-7; quiz 398. PubMed ID: 10379298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of four retentive anchor systems for implant supported overdentures--retention force changes.
    Bayer S; Steinheuser D; Grüner M; Keilig L; Enkling N; Stark H; Mues S
    Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 19371390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The measurement of retentive forces in mandibular complete overdenture with Magfit magnetic attachments].
    Du L; Xu C; Chao Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 21(5):366-8. PubMed ID: 14650991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of retentive anchor systems for overdentures.
    Svetlize CA; Bodereau EF
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Jun; 35(6):443-8. PubMed ID: 15202589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implant-supported overdentures: the ZAAG attachment system.
    Davidoff SR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Nov; 18(11):1144-8, 1150-1. PubMed ID: 9533347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
    Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overdenture retention and stabilization with ball-and-socket attachments: principles and technique.
    Banton B; Henry MD
    J Dent Technol; 1997 Sep; 14(7):14-20. PubMed ID: 9524489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
    Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
    Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of attachment wear on retention of mandibular overdenture.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Takahashi H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jan; 34(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 17207077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ERA implant-supported overdenture.
    Davidoff SR; Davis RP
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1995 May; 16(5):512, 514, 516 passim; quiz 522. PubMed ID: 8624990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention of prefabricated attachments for implant stabilized overdentures in the edentulous mandible: an in vitro study.
    Setz I; Lee SH; Engel E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Sep; 80(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 9760365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.