89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10379328)
1. Biomechanical analysis of prophylactic fixation for middle third humeral impending pathologic fractures.
Damron TA; Rock MG; Choudhury SN; Grabowski JJ; An KN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Jun; (363):240-8. PubMed ID: 10379328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical analysis of prophylactic fixation for pathological fractures of the distal third of the humerus.
Damron TA; Heiner JP; Freund EM; Damron LA; McCabe R; Vanderby R
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1994 Jun; 76(6):839-47. PubMed ID: 8200890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A biomechanical study on internal and external fixation devices for treatment of humeral shaft fracture].
Niu X; Huang F; Cen S; Qin T; Wang R; Shang Z; Liu A; Zheng H
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 22(5):516-9. PubMed ID: 18630425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of an expandable nail for the fixation of midshaft fractures.
Maher SA; Meyers K; Borens O; Suk M; Grose A; Wright TM; Helfet D
J Trauma; 2007 Jul; 63(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 17622876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Biomechanical test of intramedullary controlled dynamic nailing].
Wang G; Peng X; Wang J; Pan T
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 22(6):703-6. PubMed ID: 18630568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rotational stability of femoral osteosynthesis in femoral fractures - navigated measurements.
Citak M; Kendoff D; Gardner MJ; Oszwald M; O'Loughlin PF; Olivier LC; Krettek C; Hüfner T; Citak M
Technol Health Care; 2009; 17(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 19478402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Locked vs. unlocked plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus - a biomechanical study.
Seide K; Triebe J; Faschingbauer M; Schulz AP; Püschel K; Mehrtens G; Jürgens Ch
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 17134800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Compression-locked nailing of the humerus: a mechanical analysis.
Verbruggen JP; Sternstein W; Blum J; Rommens PM; Stapert JW
Acta Orthop; 2007 Feb; 78(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 17453406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of two different periarticular plating systems for stabilization of complex distal humerus fractures.
Schwartz A; Oka R; Odell T; Mahar A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):950-5. PubMed ID: 16782245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical analysis of supracondylar humerus fracture pinning for slightly malreduced fractures.
Bloom T; Robertson C; Mahar AT; Newton P
J Pediatr Orthop; 2008; 28(7):766-72. PubMed ID: 18812905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of antegrade and retrograde nailing of humeral shaft fracture.
Lin J; Inoue N; Valdevit A; Hang YS; Hou SM; Chao EY
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Jun; (351):203-13. PubMed ID: 9646764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The biomechanics of ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures: a comparison of 5 fracture fixation techniques.
McConnell A; Zdero R; Syed K; Peskun C; Schemitsch E
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Sep; 22(8):517-24. PubMed ID: 18758281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is humeral segmental defect replacement device a stronger construct than locked IM nailing?
Heck R; Marinescu R; Janda H; Cooper S; Schroeder J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Jan; 468(1):252-8. PubMed ID: 19543862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.
Heiney JP; Barnett MD; Vrabec GA; Schoenfeld AJ; Baji A; Njus GO
J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 19204519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of pathological fractures of the humerus with a locked intramedullary nail.
Bauze AJ; Clayer MT
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2003 Jun; 11(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 12810969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative biomechanical analysis of implants for the stabilization of proximal humerus fractures.
Füchtmeier B; May R; Fierlbeck J; Hammer J; Nerlich M
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):261-70. PubMed ID: 17065749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of humeral diaphyseal segmental defect fixation.
Henry JC; Damron TA; Weiner MM; Higgins ME; Werner FW; Sim FH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Mar; (396):231-9. PubMed ID: 11859248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of compressive force generation by plating and intramedullary nailing techniques in a transverse diaphyseal humerus fracture model.
Virkus WV; Goldberg SH; Lorenz EP
J Trauma; 2008 Jul; 65(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 18580515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proximal humerus fractures: a comparative biomechanical analysis of intra and extramedullary implants.
Füchtmeier B; May R; Hente R; Maghsudi M; Völk M; Hammer J; Nerlich M; Prantl L
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2007 Aug; 127(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 17457598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
