These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10379691)

  • 1. Estimating sample sizes for continuous, binary, and ordinal outcomes in paired comparisons: practical hints.
    Julious SA; Campbell MJ; Altman DG
    J Biopharm Stat; 1999 May; 9(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 10379691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calculation of sample size for stroke trials assessing functional outcome: comparison of binary and ordinal approaches.
    Optimising Analysis of Stroke Trials Collaboration
    Int J Stroke; 2008 May; 3(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 18705999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size in clinical trials with dichotomous endpoints: use of covariables.
    Choi SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Jul; 8(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 9741853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A note on sample size calculation for mean comparisons based on noncentral t-statistics.
    Chow SC; Shao J; Wang H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 12477068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A note on the sample size determination in two-period repeated measurements crossover design with application to clinical trials.
    Yue LQ; Roach P
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Nov; 8(4):577-84. PubMed ID: 9855035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conditional power calculations for clinical trials with historical controls.
    Korn EL; Freidlin B
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):2922-31. PubMed ID: 16479548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample-size calculations for studies with correlated ordinal outcomes.
    Kim HY; Williamson JM; Lyles CM
    Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(19):2977-87. PubMed ID: 16149125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes.
    Walters SJ; Campbell MJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1075-102. PubMed ID: 15570625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size of randomized double-blind trials 1976-1991.
    Mulward S; Gotzsche PC
    Dan Med Bull; 1996 Feb; 43(1):96-8. PubMed ID: 8906985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimates, power and sample size calculations for two-sample ordinal outcomes under before-after study designs.
    Strickland PA; Lu SE
    Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(11):1807-18. PubMed ID: 12754716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modification of the computational procedure in Parker and Bregman's method of calculating sample size from matched case-control studies with a dichotomous exposure.
    Novikov I; Oberman B; Freedman L
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1123-6; discussion 1126-7. PubMed ID: 16401288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size determination for controlling the upper confidence limit of incidence rate of a binomial endpoint.
    Shen LZ
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Jul; 8(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 9741861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over clinical trials. II: Binary outcomes.
    Curtin F; Elbourne D; Altman DG
    Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(15):2145-59. PubMed ID: 12210630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consultants' forum: should post hoc sample size calculations be done?
    Walters SJ
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18416448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of continuous versus dichotomous outcome variables on study power when sample sizes of orthopaedic randomized trials are small.
    Bhandari M; Lochner H; Tornetta P
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2002 Mar; 122(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 11880910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the number needed to treat (NNT) index when the data are subject to error.
    Walter SD; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(6):893-906. PubMed ID: 11252011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tutorial in biostatistics: sample sizes for parallel group clinical trials with binary data.
    Julious SA; Campbell MJ
    Stat Med; 2012 Oct; 31(24):2904-36. PubMed ID: 22714646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the response rates for superiority, noninferiority and equivalence testing with multiple-to-one matched binary data.
    Tsong Y; Yuan M; Dong X; Wu YT; Shen M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 23331224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size, power calculations, and their implications for the cost of thorough studies of drug induced QT interval prolongation.
    Malik M; Hnatkova K; Batchvarov V; Gang Y; Smetana P; Camm AJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Dec; 27(12):1659-69. PubMed ID: 15613131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining several ordinal measures in clinical studies.
    Wittkowski KM; Lee E; Nussbaum R; Chamian FN; Krueger JG
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1579-92. PubMed ID: 15122738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.