108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10379857)
61. Comparison between one day and two days protocols for sentinel node mapping of breast cancer patients.
Ali J; Alireza R; Mostafa M; Naser FM; Bahram M; Ramin S
Hell J Nucl Med; 2011; 14(3):313-5. PubMed ID: 22087458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Radionavigated detection of sentinel nodes in breast carcinoma--first experiences of our department.
Duchaj B; Chvalny P; Vesely J; Makaiova I; Durdik S; Straka V; Palaj J; Procka V; Aksamitova K; Skraskova S; Banki P; Kovacova S; Galbavy S
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2010; 111(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 20429309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Sentinel node biopsy versus low axillary sampling in women with clinically node negative operable breast cancer.
Parmar V; Hawaldar R; Nair NS; Shet T; Vanmali V; Desai S; Gupta S; Rangrajan V; Mittra I; Badwe RA
Breast; 2013 Dec; 22(6):1081-6. PubMed ID: 23948301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Does a Positive Axillary Lymph Node Needle Biopsy Result Predict the Need for an Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients in the ACOSOG Z0011 Era?
Pilewskie M; Mautner SK; Stempel M; Eaton A; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):1123-8. PubMed ID: 26553439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Results of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer are predictive of identification of axillary sentinel lymph nodes.
Marchal F; Rauch P; Morel O; Mayer JC; Olivier P; Leroux A; Verhaeghe JL; Guillemin F
World J Surg; 2006 Jan; 30(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16369717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Axillary lymph nodes suspicious for breast cancer metastasis: sampling with US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy--clinical experience in 100 patients.
Abe H; Schmidt RA; Kulkarni K; Sennett CA; Mueller JS; Newstead GM
Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18955508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Axillary Staging of Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer by Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology: Which Ultrasound Criteria for Classifying Abnormal Lymph Nodes Should Be Adopted in the Post-ACOSOG Z0011 Trial Era?
Zhu Y; Zhou W; Zhou JQ; Fei XC; Ye TJ; Huang O; Chen XS; Zhan WW
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 May; 35(5):885-93. PubMed ID: 27009312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Optical Coherence Tomography: A Novel Imaging Method for Post-lumpectomy Breast Margin Assessment-A Multi-reader Study.
Ha R; Friedlander LC; Hibshoosh H; Hendon C; Feldman S; Ahn S; Schmidt H; Akens MK; Fitzmaurice M; Wilson BC; Mango VL
Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):279-287. PubMed ID: 29174226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Re-excision rate after sector resection for breast cancer: A 5-year retrospective cohort study.
Clement Z; McLeay W; Hoffmann C; Shin P; Chowdhry M; Eaton M
Breast Dis; 2019; 38(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 30198861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Role of axillary lymph node ultrasound and large core biopsy in the preoperative assessment of patients selected for sentinel node biopsy.
Nori J; Bazzocchi M; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Nori Bufalini F; Mangialavori G; Distante V; Masi A; Simoncini R; Londero V
Radiol Med; 2005 Apr; 109(4):330-44. PubMed ID: 15883518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients.
Obedian E; Haffty BG
Cancer J Sci Am; 2000; 6(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 10696736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Sentinel node biopsy and concomitant probe-guided tumor excision of nonpalpable breast cancer.
van Rijk MC; Tanis PJ; Nieweg OE; Loo CE; Olmos RA; Oldenburg HS; Rutgers EJ; Hoefnagel CA; Kroon BB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):627-32. PubMed ID: 17151797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Radio-guided surgery for lymph node recurrences of differentiated thyroid cancer.
Salvatori M; Rufini V; Reale F; Samanes Gajate AM; Maussier ML; Revelli L; Troncone L; Ardito G
World J Surg; 2003 Jul; 27(7):770-5. PubMed ID: 14509503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Routine Axillary Ultrasound for Patients with T1-T2 Breast Cancer Does Not Increase the Rate of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Based on Predictive Modeling.
Wellington J; Sanders T; Mylander C; Alden A; Harris C; Buras R; Tafra L; Liang W; Stelle L; Rosman M; Jackson RS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):2271-2278. PubMed ID: 29868976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients after overnight migration of radiolabelled sulphur colloid.
Lamichhane N; Shen KW; Li CL; Han QX; Zhang YJ; Shao ZM; Shen ZZ
Postgrad Med J; 2004 Sep; 80(947):546-50. PubMed ID: 15356357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Lymphoscintigraphic sentinel node imaging and gamma probe detection in breast cancer with Tc-99m nanocolloidal albumin: results of an optimized protocol.
Rink T; Heuser T; Fitz H; Schroth HJ; Weller E; Zippel HH
Clin Nucl Med; 2001 Apr; 26(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 11290886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Sentinel node biopsy in the staging of breast cancer.
Snider H; Dowlatshahi K; Fan M; Bridger WM; Rayudu G; Oleske D
Am J Surg; 1998 Oct; 176(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 9817244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Preoperative Axillary US in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Potential to Prevent Unnecessary Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.
Kim GR; Choi JS; Han BK; Lee JE; Nam SJ; Ko EY; Ko ES; Lee SK
Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 29558291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. FDG PET positive lymph nodes are highly predictive of metastasis in breast cancer.
Kumar R; Zhuang H; Schnall M; Conant E; Damia S; Weinstein S; Chandra P; Czerniecki B; Alavi A
Nucl Med Commun; 2006 Mar; 27(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 16479242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Occult breast lesion localization plus sentinel node biopsy (SNOLL): experience with 959 patients at the European Institute of Oncology.
Monti S; Galimberti V; Trifiro G; De Cicco C; Peradze N; Brenelli F; Fernandez-Rodriguez J; Rotmensz N; Latronico A; Berrettini A; Mauri M; Machado L; Luini A; Paganelli G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2928-31. PubMed ID: 17674108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
