113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10380414)
1. Applicant reactions to test score banding in entry-level and promotional contexts.
Truxillo DM; Bauer TN
J Appl Psychol; 1999 Jun; 84(3):322-39. PubMed ID: 10380414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effects of Regulatory Fit between Explanation Framing and Applicants' Regulatory Foci on Applicant Reaction.
Bian R; Lin P; Gao Q; Li J; Yang X
J Psychol; 2020; 154(2):176-198. PubMed ID: 31738655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: a longitudinal field study.
Truxillo DM; Bauer TN; Campion MA; Paronto ME
J Appl Psychol; 2002 Dec; 87(6):1020-31. PubMed ID: 12558210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reactions to diversity in recruitment advertising--are differences black and white?
Avery DR
J Appl Psychol; 2003 Aug; 88(4):672-9. PubMed ID: 12940407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Black applicants' reactions to affirmative action plans: effects of plan content and previous experience with discrimination.
Slaughter JE; Sinar EF; Bachiochi PD
J Appl Psychol; 2002 Apr; 87(2):333-44. PubMed ID: 12002961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reactions to two versions of affirmative action among whites, blacks, and Hispanics.
Kravitz DA; Klineberg SL
J Appl Psychol; 2000 Aug; 85(4):597-611. PubMed ID: 10948804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Organizational justice and Black applicants' reactions to affirmative action.
Cropanzano R; Slaughter JE; Bachiochi PD
J Appl Psychol; 2005 Nov; 90(6):1168-84. PubMed ID: 16316272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applicant Reactions to the AAMC Standardized Video Interview During the 2018 Application Cycle.
Deiorio NM; Jarou ZJ; Alker A; Bird SB; Druck J; Gallahue FE; Hiller KM; Karl E; Pierce AE; Fletcher L; Dunleavy D
Acad Med; 2019 Oct; 94(10):1498-1505. PubMed ID: 31219811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective.
Wilhelmy A; Kleinmann M; Melchers KG; Götz M
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():740. PubMed ID: 28611696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection.
Honkaniemi L; Tolvanen A; Feldt T
Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 21752026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. White Americans' opposition to affirmative action: group interest and the harm to beneficiaries objection.
O'Brien LT; Garcia D; Crandall CS; Kordys J
Br J Soc Psychol; 2010 Dec; 49(Pt 4):895-903. PubMed ID: 20712918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are Adewale and Ngochi more employable than Jamal and Lakeisha? The influence of nationality and ethnicity cues on employment-related evaluations of Blacks in the United States.
Howard S; Borgella AM
J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jul; 160(4):509-519. PubMed ID: 31675282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residency match: applicant survey.
Lansford CD; Fisher SR; Ossoff RH; Chole RA
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Sep; 130(9):1017-23. PubMed ID: 15381585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of job applicants: the effects of age versus success.
Connor CL; Walsh P; Litzelman DK; Alvarez MG
J Gerontol; 1978 Mar; 33(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 627708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and examination of an expectancy-based measure of test-taking motivation.
Sanchez RJ; Truxillo DM; Bauer TN
J Appl Psychol; 2000 Oct; 85(5):739-50. PubMed ID: 11055146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sexism and beautyism effects in selection as a function of self-monitoring level of decision maker.
Jawahar IM; Mattsson J
J Appl Psychol; 2005 May; 90(3):563-73. PubMed ID: 15910150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attitudes toward hiring offenders: the roles of criminal history, job qualifications, and race.
Varghese FP; Hardin EE; Bauer RL; Morgan RD
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Oct; 54(5):769-82. PubMed ID: 19729578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applicant Personality and Procedural Justice Perceptions of Group Selection Interviews.
Bye HH; Sandal GM
J Bus Psychol; 2016; 31(4):569-582. PubMed ID: 27881901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Job context, selection decision outcome, and the perceived fairness of selection tests: biodata as an illustrative case.
Elkins TJ; Phillips JS
J Appl Psychol; 2000 Jun; 85(3):479-84. PubMed ID: 10900821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pre-employment screening and applicants' attitudes toward an employment opportunity.
Rafaeli A
J Soc Psychol; 1999 Dec; 139(6):700-12. PubMed ID: 10646305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
