These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10380664)

  • 21. Finite difference solution of a two-dimensional mathematical model of the cochlea.
    Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 May; 69(5):1386-91. PubMed ID: 7240568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of different stapes prostheses on the passive vibration of the basilar membrane.
    Kwacz M; Marek P; Borkowski P; Gambin W
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():13-26. PubMed ID: 24463104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of complex stapes motion on the response of the cochlea.
    Huber AM; Sequeira D; Breuninger C; Eiber A
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1187-92. PubMed ID: 18580545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of static force on round window stimulation with the direct acoustic cochlea stimulator.
    Maier H; Salcher R; Schwab B; Lenarz T
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():115-24. PubMed ID: 23276731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of perilymph viscosity on low-frequency intracochlear pressures and the cochlear input impedance of the cat.
    Koshigoe S; Kwok WK; Tubis A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Aug; 74(2):486-92. PubMed ID: 6619426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Finite element modelling of human auditory periphery including a feed-forward amplification of the cochlea.
    Wang X; Wang L; Zhou J; Hu Y
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014 Aug; 17(10):1096-107. PubMed ID: 23171060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A parametric study of cochlear input impedance.
    Puria S; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):287-309. PubMed ID: 2002170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acoustical inverse problem for the cochlea.
    Sondhi MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Feb; 69(2):500-4. PubMed ID: 7462472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Developing a physical model of the human cochlea using micro-fabrication methods.
    Wittbrodt MJ; Steele CR; Puria S
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 16439833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of rocking stapes motions on the cochlear fluid flow and on the basilar membrane motion.
    Edom E; Obrist D; Henniger R; Kleiser L; Sim JH; Huber AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3749-58. PubMed ID: 24180785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acoustic input impedance of the stapes and cochlea in human temporal bones.
    Merchant SN; Ravicz ME; Rosowski JJ
    Hear Res; 1996 Aug; 97(1-2):30-45. PubMed ID: 8844184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cochlear model including three-dimensional fluid and four modes of partition flexibility.
    Taber LA; Steele CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Aug; 70(2):426-36. PubMed ID: 7288028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three-dimensional analysis of electrode behavior in a human cochlear model.
    Lim YS; Park SI; Kim YH; Oh SH; Kim SJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Oct; 27(8):695-703. PubMed ID: 16139767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital solution of cochlear mechanics problems.
    de Boer E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 May; 69(5):1369-73. PubMed ID: 7240566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mathematical modeling of cochlear mechanics.
    Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jul; 78(1 Pt 2):345-52. PubMed ID: 4031241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A wave finite element analysis of the passive cochlea.
    Elliott SJ; Ni G; Mace BR; Lineton B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1535-45. PubMed ID: 23464024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Statistics of instabilities in a state space model of the human cochlea.
    Ku EM; Elliott SJ; Lineton B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1068-79. PubMed ID: 18681597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of auditory responses determined by acoustic stimulation and by mechanical round window stimulation at equivalent stapes velocities.
    Lee J; Seong K; Lee SH; Lee KY; Cho JH
    Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 314():65-71. PubMed ID: 24768763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the fluid-structure interaction in the cochlea.
    Rapson MJ; Hamilton TJ; Tapson JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):284-300. PubMed ID: 24993214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. II. Estimating tuning characteristics using three stimulus tones.
    Mills DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):507-23. PubMed ID: 9440336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.