These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10380671)

  • 1. System identification of feedback in hearing aids.
    Hellgren J; Lunner T; Arlinger S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3481-96. PubMed ID: 10380671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Basic acoustic considerations of ear canal probe measurements.
    Dirks DD; Kincaid GE
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5 Suppl):60S-67S. PubMed ID: 3678652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-retest reliability of probe-microphone verification in children fitted with open and closed hearing aid tips.
    Kim H; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 24047950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of venting on wind noise levels measured at the eardrum.
    Chung K
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 23403807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A computer simulation of hearing aid response and the effects of ear canal size.
    Kates JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 May; 83(5):1952-63. PubMed ID: 3403807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variations in the feedback of hearing aids.
    Hellgren J; Lunner T; Arlinger S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2821-33. PubMed ID: 10573898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation into sound attenuation by earmould tubing.
    Flack L; White R; Tweed J; Gregory DW; Qureshi MY
    Br J Audiol; 1995 Aug; 29(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 8563655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of venting on in-the-ear, in-the-canal, and completely-in-the-canal hearing aid shell frequency responses: real-ear measures.
    Stuart A; Allen R; Downs CR; Carpenter M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Aug; 42(4):804-13. PubMed ID: 10450902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individualized correction factors in the preselection of hearing aids.
    Fikret-Pasa S; Revit LJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):384-400. PubMed ID: 1573878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probe tube systems: effects of equalization on real ear insertion and aided gain.
    Moskal NL; Goldstein DP
    Ear Hear; 1992 Feb; 13(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 1541373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new hearing aid variant. Preliminary evaluation.
    Türk R
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(4):179-85. PubMed ID: 3438699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of microphone location in ITE versus BTE hearing aids.
    Gartrell EL; Church GT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Jul; 1(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 2132598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic effects in in-the-ear hearing aid response: results from a computer simulation.
    Kates JM
    Ear Hear; 1988 Jun; 9(3):119-32. PubMed ID: 3410175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The EarLens system: new sound transduction methods.
    Perkins R; Fay JP; Rucker P; Rosen M; Olson L; Puria S
    Hear Res; 2010 May; 263(1-2):104-13. PubMed ID: 20116419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transverse pressure distributions in a simple model ear canal occluded by a hearing aid test fixture.
    Stinson MR; Daigle GA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3689-702. PubMed ID: 17552720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of a miniature microphone in the ear canal for the verification of hearing aid performance.
    Harford ER
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(6):329-37. PubMed ID: 7439566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Room reverberation effects in hearing aid feedback cancellation.
    Kates JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):367-78. PubMed ID: 11206165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary evaluation of a light-based contact hearing device for the hearing impaired.
    Fay JP; Perkins R; Levy SC; Nilsson M; Puria S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jul; 34(5):912-21. PubMed ID: 23524632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occlusion effect of earmolds with different venting systems.
    Kiessling J; Brenner B; Jespersen CT; Groth J; Jensen OD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Apr; 16(4):237-49. PubMed ID: 16050334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-implantable Artificial Hearing Technology.
    Lu L; Zhang X; Gao X
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2019; 1130():145-163. PubMed ID: 30915706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.