355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10381834)
1. The synergistic relationship between health and human rights: a case study using female genital mutilation.
Moore K; Randolph K; Toubia N; Kirberger E
Health Hum Rights; 1997; 2(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 10381834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Female genital mutilation condemned by WMA.
Richards T
BMJ; 1993 Oct; 307(6910):957. PubMed ID: 11643181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Women in Egypt: new roles and realities.
Lesch AM; Sullivan EL
UFSI Rep; 1986; (22):1-9. PubMed ID: 12315070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion and moral consensus: beyond Solomon's choice.
Kolbenschlag M
Christ Century; 1985 Feb; 102(6):179-83. PubMed ID: 11653713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Female circumcision.
Abu Daia JM
Saudi Med J; 2000 Oct; 21(10):921-3. PubMed ID: 11369952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion and Islam: policies and practice in the Middle East and North Africa.
Hessini L
Reprod Health Matters; 2007 May; 15(29):75-84. PubMed ID: 17512379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On abortion: a Lincolnian position.
McKenna G
Atl Mon; 1995 Sep; 276(3):51-54, 56, 58-61, 64, 66-68. PubMed ID: 11660130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Female genital mutilation. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 151.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Gynecologic Practice [and] Committee on International Affairs
ACOG Comm Opin; 1995 Jan; No. 151():1 p. PubMed ID: 11660325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Simmering abortion debate goes public in Brazil.
Serbin K
Christ Century; 1995 Mar; 112(8):266-71. PubMed ID: 11660015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Female circumcision/genital mutilation and ethical relativism.
Kopelman LM
Second Opin; 1994 Oct; 20(2):55-71. PubMed ID: 11645284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Genital mutilation may raise awkward issues for MDs after birth.
Younger-Lewis C
CMAJ; 1997 Oct; 157(8):1013. PubMed ID: 11655146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Genital mutilation of women. A new challenge for the health service].
Sundby J; Austveg B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Sep; 113(21):2704-7. PubMed ID: 8266295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion as a social problem: the construction of "opposite" solutions in Sweden and the United States.
Linders A
Soc Probl; 1998 Nov; 45(4):488-509. PubMed ID: 11657705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion: a question of Catholic honesty.
Maguire DC
Christ Century; 1983 Sep; 100(26):803-7. PubMed ID: 11658446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The battle over abortion.
Salholz E
Newsweek; 1989 May; 113(18):28-32, 34-36, 38. PubMed ID: 11659104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Women and culture. The case for universal rights.
Ruether RR
Conscience; 1996; 16(4):13-5. PubMed ID: 12178863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
Appleton SF
Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Violence against women.
Nelson T
World Watch; 1996; 9(4):33-8. PubMed ID: 12291323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The "gag rule" revisited: physicians as abortion gatekeepers.
Bloche MG
Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 11651561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion and the law: questions for feminism.
Menon N
Can J Women Law; 1993; 6(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 11659745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
