BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10382776)

  • 21. Posterior stabilization in L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis with paralaminar screw fixation: anatomical and clinical results.
    Jeanneret B; Miclau T; Kuster M; Neuer W; Magerl F
    J Spinal Disord; 1996 Jun; 9(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 8854278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A study of sacral anthropometry to determine S1 screw placement for spinal lumbosacral fixation in the Korean population.
    Kim YY; Ha KY; Kim SI; Oh IS
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Nov; 24(11):2525-9. PubMed ID: 26228185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Feasibility of minimally invasive sacropelvic fixation: percutaneous S2 alar iliac fixation.
    O'Brien JR; Matteini L; Yu WD; Kebaish KM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):460-4. PubMed ID: 20110839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Determination of a neurologic safe zone for bicortical S1 pedicle screw placement.
    Coskun E; Wellington IJ; Bellas N; Singh H; Mallozzi SS; Cote MP; Moss IL
    Spine J; 2022 Oct; 22(10):1708-1715. PubMed ID: 35504567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Radiologic and morphologic evaluation of the lateral sacral mass].
    Esenkaya I; Aluçlu MA; Kavakli A; Bulut HT
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2003; 37(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 14578656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomechanical evaluation of S2 alar-iliac screws: effect of length and quad-cortical purchase as compared with iliac fixation.
    OʼBrien JR; Yu W; Kaufman BE; Bucklen B; Salloum K; Khalil S; Gudipally M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Sep; 38(20):E1250-5. PubMed ID: 23759811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Metric study of Egyptian sacrum for lumbo-sacral fixation procedures.
    Hassanein GH
    Clin Anat; 2011 Mar; 24(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 21322044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Morphometric characteristics of the sacrum in Mexican population. Its importance in lumbosacral fusion and fixation procedures].
    Morales-Ávalos R; Leyva-Villegas JI; Vílchez-Cavazos F; Martínez-Ponce de León ÁR; Elizondo-Omaña RE; Guzmán-López S
    Cir Cir; 2012; 80(6):528-35. PubMed ID: 23336147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variation in bone mineral density of the sacrum in young adults and its significance for sacral fixation.
    Zheng Y; Lu WW; Zhu Q; Qin L; Zhong S; Leong JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Feb; 25(3):353-7. PubMed ID: 10703109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computed tomographic considerations of dorsal sacral screw placement.
    Ebraheim NA; Xu R; Li J; Yeasting RA
    J Spinal Disord; 1998 Feb; 11(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 9493773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The human sacrum and safe approaches for screw placement.
    Arman C; Naderi S; Kiray A; Aksu FT; Yilmaz HS; Tetik S; Korman E
    J Clin Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 16(8):1046-9. PubMed ID: 19442524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Critical dimensions of trans-sacral corridors assessed by 3D CT models: Relevance for implant positioning in fractures of the sacrum.
    Wagner D; Kamer L; Sawaguchi T; Geoff Richards R; Noser H; Uesugi M; Ossendorf C; Rommens PM
    J Orthop Res; 2017 Nov; 35(11):2577-2584. PubMed ID: 28247980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Harms technique of C1-C2 fixation with polyaxial screws and rods].
    Stulík J; Vyskocil T; Sebesta P; Kryl J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 15860148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Advantages of the paraspinal muscle splitting approach in comparison with conventional midline approach for s1 pedicle screw placement.
    Ota M; Neo M; Fujibayashi S; Takemoto M; Nakamura T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(11):E452-7. PubMed ID: 20473116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of stability of two kinds of sacro-iliac screws in the fixation of bilateral sacral fractures in a finite element model.
    Zhao Y; Li J; Wang D; Liu Y; Tan J; Zhang S
    Injury; 2012 Apr; 43(4):490-4. PubMed ID: 22281196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Location of the first and second sacral nerve roots in relation to pedicle screw placement.
    Ebraheim NA; Lu J; Biyani A; Galluch D; Yang H; Yeasting RA
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2000 Nov; 29(11):873-7. PubMed ID: 11079106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Determination of the length of anteromedial screw trajectory by measuring interforaminal distance in the first sacral vertebra.
    Okutan O; Kaptanoglu E; Solaroglu I; Beskonakli E; Tekdemir I
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(15):1608-11. PubMed ID: 15284502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Unilateral and bilateral sacropelvic fixation result in similar construct biomechanics.
    Tomlinson T; Chen J; Upasani V; Mahar A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2127-33. PubMed ID: 18794753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiological evaluation of S1 dorsal screw placement.
    Ebraheim NA; Mermer M; Xu R; Yeasting RA
    J Spinal Disord; 1996 Dec; 9(6):527-35. PubMed ID: 8976494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recommendations for iliosacral screw placement in dysmorphic sacrum based on modified in-out-in corridors.
    Wendt H; Gottschling H; Schröder M; Marintschev I; Hofmann GO; Burgkart R; Gras F
    J Orthop Res; 2019 Mar; 37(3):689-696. PubMed ID: 30537046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.