These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10383300)

  • 1. Australia. Budget back report on boosting biotech.
    Finkel E
    Science; 1999 May; 284(5418):1248-9. PubMed ID: 10383300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nuclear safety and biotech boosted in Japan's budget.
    Saegusa A
    Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6761):451. PubMed ID: 10591194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Australia boosts medical research, but keeps other budgets level.
    Pockley P
    Nature; 1999 May; 399(6732):94. PubMed ID: 10335832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spanish R&D budget boosts biotechnology.
    Louët S
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Dec; 17(12):1156. PubMed ID: 10585705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plan for $100m boost to Israeli biotech comes under threat.
    Watzman H
    Nature; 1998 Mar; 392(6672):117. PubMed ID: 9515950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Share slump brings biotech firms to government's door.
    Check E
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6943):908. PubMed ID: 12827159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Funding bonanza for astronomy and biotech in Australia.
    Pockley P
    Nature; 2001 Aug; 412(6850):846. PubMed ID: 11528440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Australian states compete for biotech primacy.
    Norrie C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):760. PubMed ID: 12147988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biotechnology. Stem cells lose market luster.
    Vogel G
    Science; 2003 Mar; 299(5614):1830-1. PubMed ID: 12649456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surprise US election results may boost biotech.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1176. PubMed ID: 12454655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. France. The winter of discontent.
    Casassus B
    Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5660):948-9. PubMed ID: 14963302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is your biotech giving away the store?
    Jacobs T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Nov; 20(11):1079. PubMed ID: 12410245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Japan creeps toward proteomics.
    Saegusa A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jan; 18(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 10625377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. France boosts funding for biotechnology start-ups.
    Goodman S
    Nature; 2001 Dec; 414(6864):573. PubMed ID: 11740520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Iceberg alert for NIH.
    Bourne HR; Lively MO
    Science; 2012 Jul; 337(6093):390. PubMed ID: 22767896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New funds plant seeds for genome research effort.
    Kahn P
    Science; 1997 Jan; 275(5296):25-6. PubMed ID: 8999529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New Zealand launches biotech seed fund.
    Griggs K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):480-1. PubMed ID: 15085809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Australian biotech suffers growing pains.
    O'Neill G
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Apr; 23(4):401-2. PubMed ID: 15815652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The budget and medical research.
    Funder J
    Med J Aust; 1984 Nov; 141(11):692-3. PubMed ID: 6503756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. German regions compete for biotech funds.
    Abbott A; Schiermeir Q
    Nature; 1996 Feb; 379(6568):759. PubMed ID: 8587590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.