These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10384170)

  • 1. Blockout technique for impressions of teeth with increased open gingival embrasures.
    Hummert TW; Kaiser DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Jul; 82(1):100-2. PubMed ID: 10384170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical overview of removable prostheses: 2. Impression making for partial dentures.
    McCord JF; Grey NJ; Winstanley RB; Johnson A
    Dent Update; 2002 Nov; 29(9):422-7. PubMed ID: 12494557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quick esthetic remount cast for all-ceramic restorations.
    Hansen PA; Gist J
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):494-6. PubMed ID: 20456029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using silicone impression material and acrylic resin to fabricate remount casts for removable partial dentures.
    Hsu YT; Farmer JB
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 16011626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A technique to record the gingival configuration of an interim implant-supported fixed partial denture.
    Yiqing H; Yuting H; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):495-497. PubMed ID: 29703668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new device for blockout procedures in rotational path removable partial dentures.
    Luk KC; Chen PS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 May; 69(5):491-4. PubMed ID: 8483128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between incisal embrasures of natural and prosthetically restored maxillary anterior teeth.
    Baharav H; Kupershmit I; Oman M; Cardash H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 19231573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interocclusal wax impressions for use in provisional and associated fixed prosthodontic procedures.
    Hoffman JM; Rubin MK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 2685239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combination stone and resilient material for removable partial denture remount cast described and compared with two other remount cast procedures.
    Billy EJ; Shotwell J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Apr; 71(4):417-9. PubMed ID: 8196011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fabricating abutment crowns for existing removable partial dentures using custom resin clasp analogs.
    Livaditis GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Nov; 80(5):619-29. PubMed ID: 9813815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An impression technique for cast restorations.
    Culbreath JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Apr; 33(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 1090732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct custom implant impression copings for the preservation of the pontic receptor site architecture.
    Schoenbaum TR; Han TJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 22489334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of one-step vs. two-step impression techniques on long-term accuracy and dimensional stability when the finish line is within the gingival sulcular area.
    Levartovsky S; Zalis M; Pilo R; Harel N; Ganor Y; Brosh T
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 23734561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impression techniques for removable partial dentures.
    Turbyfill WF
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(4):358-64. PubMed ID: 12016678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
    Tjan AH; Nemetz H; Nguyen LT; Contino R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 1403906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A maxillomandibular record for a removable partial denture by using polyvinyl siloxane and the metal framework: A dental technique.
    Cortes Trevino DA; Razzoog ME; Saglik B; Nascimento Machado Gouveia DD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):723-725. PubMed ID: 32493570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Restoring abutment teeth with cast restorations to fit existing removable partial dentures.
    Sigaroudi K
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 May; 53(5):628-31. PubMed ID: 3889301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
    Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interproximal distance analysis of stereolithographic casts made by CAD-CAM technology: An in vitro study.
    Hoffman M; Cho SH; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):624-630. PubMed ID: 28477918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Fit of Partial Removable Dental Prostheses Based on Alginate or Polyvinyl Siloxane Impressions.
    Fokkinga WA; Witter DJ; Bronkhorst EM; Creugers NH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(1):33-37. PubMed ID: 28085976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.