These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10384213)

  • 1. Importance of sampling, extraction and preservation for the quantitation of biologically active endoto.
    Laitinen SK
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 1999; 6(1):33-38. PubMed ID: 10384213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of various dust sampling and extraction methods on the measurement of airborne endotoxin.
    Douwes J; Versloot P; Hollander A; Heederik D; Doekes G
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1995 May; 61(5):1763-9. PubMed ID: 7646014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Airborne endotoxin from indoor and outdoor environments: effect of sample dilution on the kinetic Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay.
    Dungan RS
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Mar; 8(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 21347956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Levels of bacterial endotoxin in air of animal houses determined with the use of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and Limulus test.
    Pomorska D; Larsson L; Skórska C; Sitkowska J; Dutkiewicz J
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2007; 14(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 18247467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of quantification methods of occupational endotoxin exposure.
    Liebers V; Raulf-Heimsoth M; Linsel G; Goldscheid N; Düser M; Stubel H; Brüning T
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2007 Nov; 70(21):1798-805. PubMed ID: 17934952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of five extraction protocols for quantification of endotoxin in metalworking fluid aerosol.
    Thorne PS; Bartlett KH; Phipps J; Kulhankova K
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2003 Jan; 47(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 12505904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization of airborne endotoxin exposure assessment: effects of filter type, transport conditions, extraction solutions, and storage of samples and extracts.
    Spaan S; Heederik DJ; Thorne PS; Wouters IM
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 73(19):6134-43. PubMed ID: 17675430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Field evaluation of endotoxin air sampling assay methods.
    Thorne PS; Reynolds SJ; Milton DK; Bloebaum PD; Zhang X; Whitten P; Burmeister LF
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Nov; 58(11):792-9. PubMed ID: 9373925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative personal exposures to organic dusts and endotoxin.
    Simpson JC; Niven RM; Pickering CA; Oldham LA; Fletcher AM; Francis HC
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Feb; 43(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 10206039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endotoxin measurement: aerosol sampling and application of a new Limulus method.
    Milton DK; Gere RJ; Feldman HA; Greaves IA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Jun; 51(6):331-7. PubMed ID: 2353643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endotoxin exposure in sewage treatment workers: investigation of exposure variability and comparison of analytical techniques.
    Spaan S; Smit LA; Eduard W; Larsson L; Arts HJ; Wouters IM; Heederik DJ
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2008; 15(2):251-61. PubMed ID: 19118445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of endotoxin and particle bounce in Marple cascade samplers with and without impaction grease.
    Kirychuk SP; Reynolds SJ; Koehncke N; Nakatsu J; Mehaffy J
    J Agromedicine; 2009; 14(2):242-9. PubMed ID: 19437284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Airborne environmental endotoxin: a cross-validation of sampling and analysis techniques.
    Walters M; Milton D; Larsson L; Ford T
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1994 Mar; 60(3):996-1005. PubMed ID: 8161191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exposure to airborne endotoxins among sewer workers: an exploratory study.
    Duquenne P; Ambroise D; Görner P; Clerc F; Greff-Mirguet G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Apr; 58(3):283-93. PubMed ID: 24470536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of various treatments on the quantitative recovery of endotoxin from water-soluble metalworking fluids.
    Brown ME; White EM; Feng A
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(4):517-20. PubMed ID: 10976681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endotoxin in Size-Separated Metal Working Fluid Aerosol Particles.
    Dahlman-Höglund A; Lindgren Å; Mattsby-Baltzer I
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Aug; 60(7):836-44. PubMed ID: 27268595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laboratory measurements of oil mist concentrations using filters and an electrostatic precipitator.
    Leith D; Leith FA; Boundy MG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Dec; 57(12):1137-41. PubMed ID: 8976588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Saline and buffers minimize the action of interfering factors in the bacterial endotoxins test.
    Fujita Y; Tokunaga T; Kataoka H
    Anal Biochem; 2011 Feb; 409(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 20951111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exposure to airborne culturable microorganisms and endotoxin in two Italian poultry slaughterhouses.
    Paba E; Chiominto A; Marcelloni AM; Proietto AR; Sisto R
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(7):469-78. PubMed ID: 24467310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Passive airborne dust sampling with the electrostatic dustfall collector: optimization of storage and extraction procedures for endotoxin and glucan measurement.
    Noss I; Doekes G; Sander I; Heederik DJ; Thorne PS; Wouters IM
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Aug; 54(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 20354054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.