239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10384421)
1. User needs and demands of a computer-based patient record.
Dumont R; van der Loo R; van Merode F; Tange H
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():64-9. PubMed ID: 10384421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Nursing personnel attitudes prior to the introduction of informatic tools and contemporary vision of a hospital information system].
Vereecke PJ
Rech Soins Infirm; 1996 Sep; (46):83-93. PubMed ID: 16737037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nurses' views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with electronic medical records: questionnaire development.
Otieno OG; Toyama H; Asonuma M; Kanai-Pak M; Naitoh K
J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 17877568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A tale of two hospitals: a sociotechnical appraisal of the introduction of computerized physician order entry in two Dutch hospitals.
Aarts J; Berg M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):999-1002. PubMed ID: 15360962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in doctors' and nurses' assessments of hospital culture and their views about computerised order entry systems.
Callen J; Braithwaite J; Westbrook J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():15-20. PubMed ID: 18487701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electronic nursing documentation in primary health care.
Törnvall E; Wilhelmsson S; Wahren LK
Scand J Caring Sci; 2004 Sep; 18(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 15355526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The user in the design process of an EPR.
van der Meijden MJ; Tange HJ; Boiten J; Troost J; Hasman A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():224-8. PubMed ID: 11187546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.
Lium JT; Tjora A; Faxvaag A
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18186935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the record.
Inman K
Nurs Times; 1998 Jun 17-23; 94(24):16. PubMed ID: 9735786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Interdisciplinary collaboration and the electronic medical record.
Green SD; Thomas JD
Pediatr Nurs; 2008; 34(3):225-7, 240. PubMed ID: 18649812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Moderating and mediating roles of nurses' beliefs: information systems use among Ohio nurses.
Abdrbo AA; Hudak CA; Anthony MK; Douglas SL
West J Nurs Res; 2009 Feb; 31(1):110-27. PubMed ID: 19028922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gaining MD buy-in: physician order entry.
Ferren AL
J Healthc Inf Manag; 2002; 16(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 11941925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Paper-based versus computer-based records in the emergency department: staff preferences, expectations, and concerns.
Ayatollahi H; Bath PA; Goodacre S
Health Informatics J; 2009 Sep; 15(3):199-211. PubMed ID: 19713395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors influencing nurses' attitudes towards the use of computerized health information systems in Kuwaiti hospitals.
Alquraini H; Alhashem AM; Shah MA; Chowdhury RI
J Adv Nurs; 2007 Feb; 57(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 17291201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why are people without medical needs transported by ambulance? A study of indications for pre-hospital care.
Hjälte L; Suserud BO; Herlitz J; Karlberg I
Eur J Emerg Med; 2007 Jun; 14(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 17473609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of OLD@HOME virtual health record staff opinions of the system and satisfaction with work.
Engström M; Scandurra I; Ljunggren B; Lindqvist R; Koch S; Carlsson M
Telemed J E Health; 2009 Jan; 15(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 19199848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differing faculty and housestaff acceptance of an electronic health record one year after implementation.
Hier DB; Rothschild A; LeMaistre A; Keeler J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15361024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Community readiness for a computer-based health information network.
Ervin NE; Berry MM
J N Y State Nurses Assoc; 2006; 37(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 16929715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. User expectations and perceptions of a patient management information system.
Henderson RD; Deane FP
Comput Nurs; 1996; 14(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 8681213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Leaving the paper trail behind.
Dragon N
Aust Nurs J; 2008 Jul; 16(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 18727263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
