650 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10386242)
1. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons of auscultatory hybrid and automated sphygmomanometers with mercury sphygmomanometry in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women: parallel validation studies.
Davis GK; Roberts LM; Mangos GJ; Brown MA
J Hypertens; 2015 Mar; 33(3):499-505; discussion 505-6. PubMed ID: 25380148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wrist blood pressure-measuring devices: a comparative study of accuracy with a standard auscultatory method using a mercury manometer.
Altunkan S; Yildiz S; Azer S
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Oct; 7(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 12409888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol: the Omron M5-I and the Omron 705IT.
El Assaad MA; Topouchian JA; Asmar RG
Blood Press Monit; 2003 Jun; 8(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 12900590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of three automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol: The Omron M3 Intellisense (HEM-7051-E), the Omron M2 Compact (HEM 7102-E), and the Omron R3-I Plus (HEM 6022-E).
Asmar R; Khabouth J; Topouchian J; El Feghali R; Mattar J
Blood Press Monit; 2010 Feb; 15(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 20032779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Oscillometric wrist devices: comparison with the standard mercury sphygmomanometer and estimate of the "supine" error].
Caridi G; Zoccali C; Enia G
G Ital Nefrol; 2003; 20(6):589-91. PubMed ID: 14732910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of an automated oscillometric blood pressure wrist device.
Cuckson AC; Moran P; Seed P; Reinders A; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15021076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of wrist blood pressure measurement with conventional sphygmomanometry at a cardiology outpatient clinic.
Zweiker R; Schumacher M; Fruhwald FM; Watzinger N; Klein W
J Hypertens; 2000 Aug; 18(8):1013-8. PubMed ID: 10953991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT).
Topouchian JA; El Assaad MA; Orobinskaia LV; El Feghali RN; Asmar RG
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 16702826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of arm blood pressure using different oscillometry manometers compared to auscultatory readings.
Shahriari M; Rotenberg DK; Nielsen JK; Wiinberg N; Nielsen PE
Blood Press; 2003; 12(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 12875477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and 'range of uncertainty' of oscillometric blood pressure monitors around the upper arm and the wrist.
Dieterle T; Battegay E; Bucheli B; Martina B
Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):339-46. PubMed ID: 10212375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brachial or wrist blood pressure in obese patients: which is the best?
de Senarclens O; Feihl F; Giusti V; Engelberger RP; Rodieux F; Gomez P; Liaudet L; Waeber B
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Jun; 13(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 18496290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Omron HEM-637 wrist monitor to the auscultation method with the wrist position sensor on or disabled.
Yarows SA
Am J Hypertens; 2004 Jan; 17(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 14700513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric BP measurements in children with obesity and their effect on the diagnosis of arterial hypertension.
Fonseca-Reyes S; Romero-Velarde E; Torres-Gudiño E; Illescas-Zarate D; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM
Arch Cardiol Mex; 2018; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 28238543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park SH; Park YS
Blood Press Monit; 2019 Dec; 24(6):265-276. PubMed ID: 31658107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
