650 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10386242)
21. [Value of blood pressure of adults depending on method of measurement].
Wielemborek-Musiał K; Jegier A
Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2006 Jun; 115(6):529-34. PubMed ID: 17263224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validation of the Omron HEM-907 device for blood pressure measurement.
El Assaad MA; Topouchian JA; Darné BM; Asmar RG
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Aug; 7(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 12198340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessing the validity of oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement in a large population-based epidemiologic study.
Chen Z; Wang X; Wang Z; Zhang L; Hao G; Dong Y; Zhu M; Gao R;
J Am Soc Hypertens; 2017 Nov; 11(11):730-736.e4. PubMed ID: 29032943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of the Omron RS6 wrist blood pressure monitor with the positioning sensor on or off with a standard mercury sphygmomanometer.
Deutsch C; Krüger R; Saito K; Yamashita S; Sawanoi Y; Beime B; Bramlage P
Blood Press Monit; 2014 Oct; 19(5):306-13. PubMed ID: 25000543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Disagreement of the two oscillometric blood pressure measurement devices, Datascope Accutorr Plus and Omron HEM-705CP II, and bidirectional conversion of blood pressure values.
Adler C; Ellert U; Neuhauser HK
Blood Press Monit; 2014 Apr; 19(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 24583967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Belghazi J; El Feghali RN; Moussalem T; Rejdych M; Asmar RG
Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2007; 3(4):389-400. PubMed ID: 17969368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An Assessment of the Accuracy of Home Blood Pressure Monitors When Used in Device Owners.
Ringrose JS; Polley G; McLean D; Thompson A; Morales F; Padwal R
Am J Hypertens; 2017 Jul; 30(7):683-689. PubMed ID: 28430848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of a new wrist cuff oscillometric blood pressure device: comparisons with intraarterial and mercury manometer measurements.
Watson S; Wenzel RR; di Matteo C; Meier B; Lüscher TF
Am J Hypertens; 1998 Dec; 11(12):1469-74. PubMed ID: 9880129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Arm position and blood pressure: a risk factor for hypertension?
Mourad A; Carney S; Gillies A; Jones B; Nanra R; Trevillian P
J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Jun; 17(6):389-95. PubMed ID: 12764401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparative study of an ambulatory blood pressure measuring device and a wrist blood pressure monitor with a position sensor versus a mercury sphygmomanometer.
Altunkan S; Genç Y; Altunkan E
Eur J Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 18(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 17338963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Simultaneous blood pressure measurement in both arms in hypertensive and nonhypertensive adult patients.
Fonseca-Reyes S; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM; García de Alba-García JE
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 22781632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Inaccuracy of wrist-cuff oscillometric blood pressure devices: an arm position artefact?
Mourad A; Gillies A; Carney S
Blood Press Monit; 2005 Apr; 10(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 15812253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitoring with concurrent auscultatory blood pressure in hemodialysis patients.
Semret M; Zidehsarai M; Agarwal R
Blood Press Monit; 2005 Oct; 10(5):249-55. PubMed ID: 16205443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Validation of four devices: Omron M6 Comfort, Omron HEM-7420, Withings BP-800, and Polygreen KP-7670 for home blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.
Topouchian J; Agnoletti D; Blacher J; Youssef A; Chahine MN; Ibanez I; Assemani N; Asmar R
Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2014; 10():33-44. PubMed ID: 24476688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the accuracy and errors of blood pressure measured by 2 types of non-mercury sphygmomanometers in an epidemiological survey.
Choi S; Kim YM; Shin J; Lim YH; Choi SY; Choi BY; Oh KW; Lee HM; Woo KJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e10851. PubMed ID: 29923975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
