These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10386353)

  • 1. The use of composite dust wipe samples as a means of assessing lead exposure.
    Friederich NJ; Bauer KM; Schultz BD; Holderman TS
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 10386353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of surface wipe media for sampling lead on hands.
    Boeniger M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Aug; 3(8):428-34. PubMed ID: 16862713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of methods and materials for the analysis of leaded wipes.
    Harper M; Hallmark TS; Bartolucci AA
    J Environ Monit; 2002 Dec; 4(6):1025-33. PubMed ID: 12509061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface sampling for endotoxin assessment using electrostatic wiping cloths.
    Thorne PS; Metwali N; Avol E; McConnell RS
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Jul; 49(5):401-6. PubMed ID: 15689394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of four sampling methods for determining exposure of children to lead-contaminated household dust.
    Sterling DA; Roegner KC; Lewis RD; Luke DA; Wilder LC; Burchette SM
    Environ Res; 1999 Aug; 81(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 10433844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of wipe sampling materials for lead in surface dust.
    Millson M; Eller PM; Ashley K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1994 Apr; 55(4):339-42. PubMed ID: 8209839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laboratory and analytical method performance of lead measurements in paint chips, soils, and dusts.
    Schlecht PC; Groff JH; Feng A; Song R
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Nov; 57(11):1035-43. PubMed ID: 8931311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Field evaluation and comparison of five methods of sampling lead dust on carpets.
    Bai Z; Yiin LM; Rich DQ; Adgate JL; Ashley PJ; Lioy PJ; Rhoads GG; Zhang J
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 12908870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variability and specificity associated with environmental methamphetamine sampling and analysis.
    Van Dyke MV; Serrano KA; Kofford S; Contreras J; Martyny JW
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Nov; 8(11):636-41. PubMed ID: 21962231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of household lead exposure assessment methods in an old, urban community.
    Gallicchio L; Sexton M; Werner ML
    Environ Res; 2002 May; 89(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 12051785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A side-by-side comparison of dust collection methods for sampling lead-contaminated house dust.
    Lanphear BP; Emond M; Jacobs DE; Weitzman M; Tanner M; Winter NL; Yakir B; Eberly S
    Environ Res; 1995 Feb; 68(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 7601072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A portable x-ray fluorescence instrument for analyzing dust wipe samples for lead: evaluation with field samples.
    Sterling DA; Lewis RD; Luke DA; Shadel BN
    Environ Res; 2000 Jun; 83(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 10856190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis for lead on air filters from different personal samplers used in a secondary lead smelter/solder manufacturer.
    Harper M; Pacolay B
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Jan; 8(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 16395471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate and one-year post-intervention effectiveness of Maryland's lead law treatments.
    Breysse J; Anderson J; Dixon S; Galke W; Wilson J
    Environ Res; 2007 Oct; 105(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 17559831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extending wipe sampling methodologies to elements other than lead.
    McDonald LT; Rasmussen PE; Chénier M; Levesque C
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Feb; 13(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 21132198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory comparison of vacuum, OSHA, and HUD sampling methods for lead in household dust.
    Reynolds SJ; Etre L; Thorne PS; Whitten P; Selim M; Popendorf WJ
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Jun; 58(6):439-46. PubMed ID: 9183838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of a home cleaning intervention strategy in reducing potential dust and lead exposures.
    Lioy PJ; Yiin LM; Adgate J; Weisel C; Rhoads GG
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1998; 8(1):17-35. PubMed ID: 9470102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of portable XRF and ICP-OES analysis for lead on air filter samples from a lead ore concentrator mill and a lead-acid battery recycler.
    Harper M; Pacolay B; Hintz P; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Mar; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 16528423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of a wipe and a vacuum collection method for the determination of lead in residential dusts.
    Farfel MR; Lees PS; Rohde CA; Lim BS; Bannon D; Chisolm JJ
    Environ Res; 1994 May; 65(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 8187743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of a field portable X-Ray fluorescence analyzer to determine the concentration of lead and other metals in soil samples.
    Clark S; Menrath W; Chen M; Roda S; Succop P
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 1999; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10384212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.