108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10386357)
1. Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part III--Validation.
Coffey CC; Campbell DL; Myers WR
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(3):363-6. PubMed ID: 10386357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part II--Method comparison testing.
Coffey CC; Campbell DL; Myers WR; Zhuang Z
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):862-70. PubMed ID: 9866166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part I--Protocol development.
Coffey CC; Campbell DL; Myers WR; Zhuang Z; Das S
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):852-61. PubMed ID: 9866165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Campbell DL; Jensen PA; Myers WR
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):723-30. PubMed ID: 12363214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Lee K; Slavcev A; Nicas M
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 15202153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Capability of respirator wearers to detect aerosolized qualitative fit test agents (sweetener and Bitrex) with known fixed leaks.
McKay RT; Davies E
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Jun; 15(6):479-84. PubMed ID: 10853288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experiments supporting the use of ambient aerosols for quantitative respirator fit testing.
Ernstberger HG; Gall RB; Turok CW
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1988 Dec; 49(12):613-9. PubMed ID: 3213815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
Duling MG; Lawrence RB; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Real-time fit of a respirator during simulated health care tasks.
Hauge J; Roe M; Brosseau LM; Colton C
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(10):563-71. PubMed ID: 22924959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a quantitative fit testing method for N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Janssen L; Luinenburg MD; Mullins HE; Danisch SG; Nelson TJ
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 12908863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Campbell DL; Zhuang Z; Calvert CA; Jensen PA
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Apr; 1(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 15204866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of known exhalation valve damage using a negative pressure user seal check method on full facepiece respirators.
Delaney LJ; McKay RT; Freeman A
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Apr; 18(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 12637234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of respirator protection factors measured by two quantitative fit test methods.
Kolesar ES; Cosgrove DJ; de la Barre CM; Theis CF
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1982 Nov; 53(11):1116-22. PubMed ID: 7150173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between quantitative fit factors and workplace protection factors measured in actual workplace environments at a steel foundry.
Zhuang Z; Coffey CC; Jensen PA; Campbell DL; Lawrence RB; Myers WR
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(6):730-8. PubMed ID: 14674806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health care workers and respiratory protection: is the user seal check a surrogate for respirator fit-testing?
Danyluk Q; Hon CY; Neudorf M; Yassi A; Bryce E; Janssen B; Astrakianakis G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 May; 8(5):267-70. PubMed ID: 21462067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A feasibility study of quantitative respirator fit testing by controlled negative pressure.
Crutchfield CD; Eroh MP; Van Ert MD
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Apr; 52(4):172-6. PubMed ID: 2069125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of simulated respirator fit factors using aerosol and vapor challenges.
Gardner PD; Hofacre KC; Richardson AW
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 15202154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between respirator fit and respirator fit test panel cells by respirator size.
Zhuang Z; Groce D; Ahlers HW; Iskander W; Landsittel D; Guffey S; Benson S; Viscusi D; Shaffer RE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Oct; 5(10):617-28. PubMed ID: 18666022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of subject characteristics and respirator features on respirator fit.
Zhuang Z; Coffey CC; Ann RB
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Dec; 2(12):641-9. PubMed ID: 16298949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
