These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10386846)

  • 1. Tolerable hearing aid delays. I. Estimation of limits imposed by the auditory path alone using simulated hearing losses.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 1999 Jun; 20(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 10386846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tolerable hearing-aid delays: IV. effects on subjective disturbance during speech production by hearing-impaired subjects.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 15809547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tolerable hearing aid delays. II. Estimation of limits imposed during speech production.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):325-38. PubMed ID: 12195175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tolerable hearing aid delays. V. Estimation of limits for open canal fittings.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Meisenbacher K; Derleth RP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):601-17. PubMed ID: 18469715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tolerable hearing aid delays. III. Effects on speech production and perception of across-frequency variation in delay.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 12677113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disturbance caused by varying propagation delay in non-occluding hearing aid fittings.
    Groth J; Søndergaard MB
    Int J Audiol; 2004; 43(10):594-9. PubMed ID: 15724524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes.
    Moore BC; Baer T; Ives DT; Marriage J; Salorio-Corbetto M
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 26928003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A digital filterbank hearing aid: predicting user preference and performance for two signal processing algorithms.
    Lunner T; Hellgren J; Arlinger S; Elberling C
    Ear Hear; 1997 Feb; 18(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 9058034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A digital filterbank hearing aid: three digital signal processing algorithms--user preference and performance.
    Lunner T; Hellgren J; Arlinger S; Elberling C
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):373-87. PubMed ID: 9360861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Just noticeable and objectionable group delays in digital hearing aids.
    Agnew J; Thornton JM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Jun; 11(6):330-6. PubMed ID: 10858005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tolerable delay for speech production and perception: effects of hearing ability and experience with hearing aids.
    Goehring T; Chapman JL; Bleeck S; Monaghan JJM
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 28838277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of predicted ear canal speech levels using the VIOLA input/output-based fitting strategy.
    Cox RM; Flamme GA
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 9562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of conventional and in-situ audiometry on participants with varying levels of sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kiessling J; Leifholz M; Unkel S; Pons-Kühnemann J; Jespersen CT; Pedersen JN
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 25597462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Stone MA; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Jun; 33(3):157-70. PubMed ID: 10439142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits: aided speech perception measures.
    Jenstad LM; Seewald RC; Cornelisse LE; Shantz J
    Ear Hear; 1999 Apr; 20(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 10229513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An objective measure for selecting microphone modes in OMNI/DIR hearing aid circuits.
    Grant KW; Elhilali M; Shamma SA; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Summers V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 18595186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):241-58. PubMed ID: 10509859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fitting range of the BAHA Cordelle.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):429-37. PubMed ID: 17005485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.