These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10386847)
1. Cross-modality matching: a tool for measuring loudness in sensorineural impairment. Hellman RP Ear Hear; 1999 Jun; 20(3):193-213. PubMed ID: 10386847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Loudness relations for individuals and groups in normal and impaired hearing. Hellman RP; Meiselman CH J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Dec; 88(6):2596-606. PubMed ID: 2283432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing growth of loudness in children by cross-modality matching. Serpanos YC; Gravel JS J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):190-202. PubMed ID: 10783922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin. Buus S; Florentine M; Poulsen T J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3464-80. PubMed ID: 10380670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revisiting loudness measures in children using a computer method of cross-modality matching (CMM). Serpanos YC; Gravel JS J Am Acad Audiol; 2004; 15(7):486-97. PubMed ID: 15484598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rate of loudness growth for pure tones in normal and impaired hearing. Hellman RP; Meiselman CH J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):966-75. PubMed ID: 8445131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Growth of loudness in listeners with cochlear hearing losses: recruitment reconsidered. Buus S; Florentine M J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun; 3(2):120-39. PubMed ID: 12162363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-modality matching and the loudness growth function for click stimuli. Serpanos YC; O'Malley H; Gravel JS J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1022-32. PubMed ID: 9479756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Loudness growth in individual listeners with hearing losses: a review. Marozeau J; Florentine M J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):EL81. PubMed ID: 17927312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The contour test of loudness perception. Cox RM; Alexander GC; Taylor IM; Gray GA Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):388-400. PubMed ID: 9360862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between loudness intensity functions and the click-ABR wave V latency. Serpanos YC; O'Malley H; Gravel JS Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):409-19. PubMed ID: 9360864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spectral loudness summation as a function of duration for hearing-impaired listeners. Verhey JL; Anweiler AK; Hohmann V Int J Audiol; 2006 May; 45(5):287-94. PubMed ID: 16717019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Category loudness scaling to evaluate sound perception in cochlear and retro-cochlear lesions]. Nieschalk M; Schmäl F; Delank KW; Stoll W HNO; 1999 Sep; 47(9):787-95. PubMed ID: 10525607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of auditory nonlinearity for listeners with different hearing losses using temporal masking and categorical loudness scaling. Jürgens T; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Ewert SD Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):177-91. PubMed ID: 21669269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of signal duration on categorical loudness scaling in normal and in hearing-impaired listeners. Garnier S; Micheyl C; Berger-Vachon C; Collet L Audiology; 1999; 38(4):196-201. PubMed ID: 10431905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]