These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10386852)

  • 1. Automatic detection of frequency changes depends on auditory stimulus intensity.
    Salo S; Lang AH; Aaltonen O; Lertola K; Kärki T
    Ear Hear; 1999 Jun; 20(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 10386852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERPs for infrequent omissions and inclusions of stimulus elements.
    Nordby H; Hammerborg D; Roth WT; Hugdahl K
    Psychophysiology; 1994 Nov; 31(6):544-52. PubMed ID: 7846215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The mismatch negativity as an index of temporal processing in audition.
    Kujala T; Kallio J; Tervaniemi M; Näätänen R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 112(9):1712-9. PubMed ID: 11514254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of Aging and the High-Frequency Auditory Threshold on Speech-Evoked Mismatch Negativity in a Noisy Background.
    Chen J; Chen S; Zheng Y; Ou Y
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26650255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mismatch negativity in patients with (central) auditory processing disorders.
    Roggia SM; Colares NT
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2008; 74(5):705-711. PubMed ID: 19082352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is the failure to detect stimulus deviance during sleep due to a rapid fading of sensory memory or a degradation of stimulus encoding?
    Sabri M; Campbell KB
    J Sleep Res; 2005 Jun; 14(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 15910509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus duration and the sensory memory trace: an event-related potential study.
    Paavilainen P; Jiang D; Lavikainen J; Näätänen R
    Biol Psychol; 1993 Apr; 35(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 8507743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can echoic memory store two traces simultaneously? A study of event-related brain potentials.
    Winkler I; Paavilainen P; Näätänen R
    Psychophysiology; 1992 May; 29(3):337-49. PubMed ID: 1626043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transitional Probabilities Are Prioritized over Stimulus/Pattern Probabilities in Auditory Deviance Detection: Memory Basis for Predictive Sound Processing.
    Mittag M; Takegata R; Winkler I
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(37):9572-9. PubMed ID: 27629709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory stimulus discrimination recorded in dogs, as indicated by mismatch negativity (MMN).
    Howell TJ; Conduit R; Toukhsati S; Bennett P
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jan; 89(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 22001730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory sensory memory and the aging brain: A mismatch negativity study.
    Cooper RJ; Todd J; McGill K; Michie PT
    Neurobiol Aging; 2006 May; 27(5):752-62. PubMed ID: 15908049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic detection of frequency change is invariant over a large intensity range.
    Schröger E
    Neuroreport; 1994 Mar; 5(7):825-8. PubMed ID: 8018858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of stimulus frequency and complexity on the mismatch negativity and other components of the cortical auditory-evoked potential.
    Wunderlich JL; Cone-Wesson BK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1526-37. PubMed ID: 11325124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of stimulus deviance within primate primary auditory cortex: intracortical mechanisms of mismatch negativity (MMN) generation.
    Javitt DC; Steinschneider M; Schroeder CE; Vaughan HG; Arezzo JC
    Brain Res; 1994 Dec; 667(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 7697356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The mismatch negativity (MMN) with no standard stimulus.
    Pakarinen S; Huotilainen M; Näätänen R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jul; 121(7):1043-50. PubMed ID: 20207581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic discriminative sensitivity inside temporal window of sensory memory as a function of time.
    Yabe H; Koyama S; Kakigi R; Gunji A; Tervaniemi M; Sato Y; Kaneko S
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Aug; 12(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 11489607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of small variation of the frequent auditory stimulus on the event-related brain potential to the infrequent stimulus.
    Winkler I; Paavilainen P; Alho K; Reinikainen K; Sams M; Näätänen R
    Psychophysiology; 1990 Mar; 27(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 2247552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.