These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10387373)

  • 1. Patient satisfaction: the indispensable outcome.
    Bolus R; Pitts J
    Manag Care; 1999 Apr; 8(4):24-8. PubMed ID: 10387373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of grading and publicizing the physician groups' performance.
    Fine A
    Exec Solut Healthc Manag; 1998 Nov; 1(9):2-3. PubMed ID: 10187220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coming soon: a public display of your performance record.
    Pretzer M
    Med Econ; 1997 Dec; 74(24):45-6, 49. PubMed ID: 10175857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marketplace. Do satisfaction surveys really gauge how well managed care is doing?
    Moskowitz DB
    Med Health; 1998 Jun; 52(24):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10180144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of measuring patient satisfaction.
    Finkel ML
    Empl Benefits J; 1997 Mar; 22(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10165682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New tools ask patients to report, not rate.
    Manag Care Strateg; 1998 Oct; 6(10):117-9. PubMed ID: 10185964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A visit with Margaret O'Kane.
    O'Kane M
    Manag Care; 1997 Mar; 6(3):64-6, 71-2. PubMed ID: 10166610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medstat promises satisfaction reports that are free of suspicion of bias.
    Mullen P
    Manag Care; 1997 Jul; 6(7):28, 30. PubMed ID: 10169980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benchmarking patient satisfaction.
    Lund CM
    Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc; 1996; 1(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 9192571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 20/20 vision care.
    Zablocki E
    Healthplan; 1998; 39(3):27-31. PubMed ID: 10181749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surveying patient satisfaction among disadvantaged managed care customers.
    Halstead D; Becherer RC
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 1998 Nov; 16(11):15-8. PubMed ID: 10345068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are medical groups a threat to managed care organizations?
    Zwerner AR
    Med Interface; 1996 Oct; 9(10):60, 62. PubMed ID: 10161511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Under siege.
    Havighurst C
    Health Syst Rev; 1997; 30(1):7. PubMed ID: 10166187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Managing primary care using patient satisfaction measures.
    Otani K; Kurz RS; Harris LE
    J Healthc Manag; 2005; 50(5):311-24; discussion 324-5. PubMed ID: 16268410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethics of managed care: clinical and administrative implications for medical group practices.
    Philip DJ
    Coll Rev; 1997; 14(1):61-80. PubMed ID: 10182669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The hunt for healthcare quality.
    Hiebert-White J
    Health Prog; 1997; 78(3):10-2, 17. PubMed ID: 10168756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Care denials causing a stir among physicians.
    Fine A
    Exec Solut Healthc Manag; 1999 Nov; 2(11):2-5. PubMed ID: 10662292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The age of consumerism in healthcare.
    Weissman A
    J AHIMA; 1997 Jun; 68(6):47-51. PubMed ID: 10167803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient satisfaction surveys: which tool is right for you?. Interview by Elaine Zablocki.
    Davies AR
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1996 Apr; 8(3):9-13. PubMed ID: 10158895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can functional-status surveys improve your care?
    Terry K
    Med Econ; 1996 Aug; 73(15):126-8, 131-4, 137 passim. PubMed ID: 10159450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.