These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10388482)

  • 21. Papain: a novel urine adulterant.
    Burrows DL; Nicolaides A; Rice PJ; Dufforc M; Johnson DA; Ferslew KE
    J Anal Toxicol; 2005; 29(5):275-95. PubMed ID: 16105251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of RapiTest with Emit d.a.u. and GC-MS for the analysis of drugs in urine.
    Korte T; Pykäläinen J; Lillsunde P; Seppälä T
    J Anal Toxicol; 1997; 21(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 9013293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance evaluation of three on-site adulterant detection devices for urine specimens.
    Peace MR; Tarnai LD
    J Anal Toxicol; 2002 Oct; 26(7):464-70. PubMed ID: 12423001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Urinary cannabinoid detection times after controlled oral administration of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol to humans.
    Gustafson RA; Levine B; Stout PR; Klette KL; George MP; Moolchan ET; Huestis MA
    Clin Chem; 2003 Jul; 49(7):1114-24. PubMed ID: 12816908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparative evaluation of the instant-view 5-panel test card with OnTrak TesTcup Pro 5: comparison with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
    Moody DE; Fang WB; Andrenyak DM; Monti KM; Jones C
    J Anal Toxicol; 2006; 30(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 16620532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Monitoring opiate use in substance abuse treatment patients with sweat and urine drug testing.
    Huestis MA; Cone EJ; Wong CJ; Umbricht A; Preston KL
    J Anal Toxicol; 2000 Oct; 24(7):509-21. PubMed ID: 11043653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A field evaluation of five on-site drug-testing devices.
    Crouch DJ; Hersch RK; Cook RF; Frank JF; Walsh JM
    J Anal Toxicol; 2002 Oct; 26(7):493-9. PubMed ID: 12423006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of endogenous urinary biomarkers for indirect detection of urine adulteration attempts by five different chemical adulterants in mass spectrometry methods.
    Steuer AE; Kamber D; Kraemer T
    Drug Test Anal; 2019 May; 11(5):638-648. PubMed ID: 30408836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Urinary excretion profiles of 11-nor-9-carboxy-delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and 11-hydroxy-delta9-THC: cannabinoid metabolites to creatinine ratio study IV.
    Fraser AD; Worth D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Jul; 143(2-3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15240035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Confirmation of Syva enzyme multiple immunoassay technique (EMIT) d.a.u. and Roche Abuscreen radioimmunoassay (RIA) (125I) urine cannabinoid immunoassays by gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric (GC/MS) and bonded-phase adsorption/thin-layer chromatographic (BPA-TLC) methods.
    Kogan MJ; Al Razi J; Pierson DJ; Willson NJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1986 Apr; 31(2):494-500. PubMed ID: 3011956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Profiles of urine samples taken from Ecstasy users at Rave parties: analysis by immunoassays, HPLC, and GC-MS.
    Zhao H; Brenneisen R; Scholer A; McNally AJ; ElSohly MA; Murphy TP; Salamone SJ
    J Anal Toxicol; 2001; 25(4):258-69. PubMed ID: 11386639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The analytical performance of six urine drug screens on cobas 6000 and ARCHITECT i2000 compared to LC-MS/MS gold standard.
    Abou El Hassan M; Colantonio D; Likhodii S; Nassar BA
    Clin Biochem; 2021 Jul; 93():99-103. PubMed ID: 33844982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Confirmatory tests for drugs in the workplace by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
    Goldberger BA; Cone EJ
    J Chromatogr A; 1994 Jul; 674(1-2):73-86. PubMed ID: 8075776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the Triage PPY on-site testing device for the detection of dextropropoxyphene in urine.
    Poklis A; Poklis JL; Tarnai LD; Backer RC
    J Anal Toxicol; 2004 Sep; 28(6):485-8. PubMed ID: 15516300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of the validity of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of urine samples II: amphetamine, methamphetamine, (±)-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, (±)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, (±)-3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine, phencyclidine, and (±)-11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol.
    Stout PR; Bynum ND; Lewallen CM; Mitchell JM; Baylor MR; Ropero-Miller JD
    J Anal Toxicol; 2010 Oct; 34(8):430-43. PubMed ID: 21819787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Elevated urine zinc concentration reduces the detection of methamphetamine, cocaine, THC and opiates in urine by EMIT.
    Lin CN; Strathmann FG
    J Anal Toxicol; 2013; 37(9):665-9. PubMed ID: 23843421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of full-scanning GC/ion trap MS analysis of NIDA drugs-of-abuse urine testing in urine.
    Wu AH; Onigbinde TA; Wong SS; Johnson KG
    J Anal Toxicol; 1992; 16(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 1522718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of ephedrine, pseudoephedrine and phenylpropanolamine concentrations in human urine samples and a comparison of the specificity of DRI amphetamines and Abuscreen online (KIMS) amphetamines screening immunoassays.
    Stout PR; Klette KL; Horn CK
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):160-4. PubMed ID: 14979364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. False-negative results in the immunoassay analysis of drugs of abuse: can adulterants be detected by sample check test?
    Matriciani B; Huppertz B; Keller R; Weiskirchen R
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2018 May; 55(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 28728424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Drug screening and confirmation by GC-MS: comparison of EMIT II and Online KIMS against 10 drugs between US and England laboratories.
    Lu NT; Taylor BG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Mar; 157(2-3):106-16. PubMed ID: 15899564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.