These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10389730)
41. The predictive value of sequential cervical length screening in singleton pregnancies after cerclage: a retrospective cohort study. Pils S; Eppel W; Promberger R; Winter MP; Seemann R; Ott J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Apr; 16():79. PubMed ID: 27085320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The natural history of a positive response to transfundal pressure in women at risk for cervical incompetence. Guzman ER; Vintzileos AM; McLean DA; Martins ME; Benito CW; Hanley ML Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Mar; 176(3):634-8. PubMed ID: 9077619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Detection of pregnant women at risk of cervical incompetence by transvaginal sonography during straining. Sherif LS; Shalan HM J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 9311176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Serial transvaginal ultrasonography following McDonald cerclage and repeat suture insertion. Fox R; Holmes R; James M; Tuohy J; Wardle P Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Feb; 38(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 9521385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix length and the prediction of preterm delivery]. Urbaniak T; Tomaszewska K; Klejewski A Ginekol Pol; 2005 Jul; 76(7):543-7. PubMed ID: 16363380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Abdominal, perineal and vaginal sonographic diagnosis of cervix insufficiency]. Raga F; Simon C; Strasser J; Bonilla-Musoles F Ultraschall Med; 1992 Feb; 13(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 1585156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Cervical cerclage in the second trimester of pregnancy: a historical cohort study. Novy MJ; Gupta A; Wothe DD; Gupta S; Kennedy KA; Gravett MG Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1447-54; discussion 1454-6. PubMed ID: 11408867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Cervical cerclage in the prevention of preterm birth. Simcox R; Shennan A Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):831-42. PubMed ID: 17493875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of success and morbidity in cervical cerclage procedures. Harger JH Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Nov; 56(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 7001296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Reversal of asymptomatic cervical length shortening with cervical cerclage: a preliminary study. O'Connell MP; Lindow SW Hum Reprod; 2001 Jan; 16(1):172-173. PubMed ID: 11139558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Cervical cerclage: a review of the evidence. Fox NS; Chervenak FA Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2008 Jan; 63(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 18081941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Prediction of preterm delivery with transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix in patients with high-risk pregnancies: does cerclage prevent prematurity? Berghella V; Daly SF; Tolosa JE; DiVito MM; Chalmers R; Garg N; Bhullar A; Wapner RJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 181(4):809-15. PubMed ID: 10521734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Pregnancy outcomes and superiorities of prophylactic cervical cerclage and therapeutic cervical cerclage in cervical insufficiency pregnant women. Liu Y; Ke Z; Liao W; Chen H; Wei S; Lai X; Chen X Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 297(6):1503-1508. PubMed ID: 29627847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Decrease in cerclage incidence in multiple pregnancies by vaginal ultrasound monitoring]. Maly Z; Deutinger J Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1993; 197(4):162-4. PubMed ID: 8212765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The role of cervical ultrasound screening in determining the timing of emergency cerclage. Tezcan B; Hezelgrave N; Shennan A J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Jul; 32(5):444-6. PubMed ID: 22663315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]