163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10389800)
1. The influence of the tonsillar gag on efficacy of seal, anatomic position, airway patency, and airway protection with the flexible laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, cross-over study of fresh adult cadavers.
Brimacombe JR; Keller C; Gunkel AR; Pühringer F
Anesth Analg; 1999 Jul; 89(1):181-6. PubMed ID: 10389800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do laryngeal mask airway devices attenuate liquid flow between the esophagus and pharynx? A randomized, controlled cadaver study.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Rädler C; Pühringer F
Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):904-7. PubMed ID: 10195545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Morris R; Mecklem D
Anesth Analg; 1998 Oct; 87(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 9768795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid?
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Loeckinger A
Anesth Analg; 2000 Oct; 91(4):1017-20. PubMed ID: 11004067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of Air Seal of Flexible Reinforced Laryngeal Mask Airway in Thyroid Surgery Compared With Endotracheal Tube: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Gong Y; Wang J; Xu X; Li J; Song R; Yi J
Anesth Analg; 2020 Jan; 130(1):217-223. PubMed ID: 30252699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The intubating laryngeal mask airway: effect of handle elevation on efficacy of seal, fibreoptic position, blind intubation and airway protection.
Keller C; Brimacombe JR; Rädler C; Pühringer F; Brimacombe NS
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2000 Aug; 28(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 10969369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pressures exerted against the cervical vertebrae by the standard and intubating laryngeal mask airways: a randomized, controlled, cross-over study in fresh cadavers.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Keller K
Anesth Analg; 1999 Nov; 89(5):1296-300. PubMed ID: 10553855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesthesiology; 2000 Jul; 93(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 10861152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the flexible and standard laryngeal mask airways.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Can J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 46(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 10391603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The laryngeal mask airway Unique versus the Soft Seal laryngeal mask: a randomized, crossover study in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Brimacombe J; von Goedecke A; Keller C; Brimacombe L; Brimacombe M
Anesth Analg; 2004 Nov; 99(5):1560-1563. PubMed ID: 15502065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [An auto control comparison of the use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and standard laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation].
Li CW; Xue FS; Mao P; Xu YC; Liu Y; Zhang GH; Liu KP; Sun HT
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2007 Feb; 19(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 17326908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The safety and efficacy of the use of the flexible laryngeal mask airway with positive pressure ventilation in elective ENT surgery: a 15-year retrospective single-center study.
Nekhendzy V; Ramaiah VK; Collins J; Lemmens HJ; Most SP
Minerva Anestesiol; 2017 Sep; 83(9):947-955. PubMed ID: 28358175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Fiberoptic determination of the position of the laryngeal mask].
Pothmann W; Füllekrug B; Schulte am Esch J
Anaesthesist; 1992 Dec; 41(12):779-84. PubMed ID: 1489077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The laryngeal mask airway in fresh cadavers versus paralysed anaesthetized patients: ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure, intracuff pressures and anatomic position.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1999 Oct; 16(10):699-701. PubMed ID: 10583353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of pharyngeal mucosal pressure and airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized adult patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesth Analg; 1998 Dec; 87(6):1379-82. PubMed ID: 9842832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients.
Cook TM; Nolan JP; Verghese C; Strube PJ; Lees M; Millar JM; Baskett PJ
Br J Anaesth; 2002 Apr; 88(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 12066729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In cadavers, directly measured mucosal pressures are similar for the Unique and the Soft Seal laryngeal mask airway devices.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Moriggl B; Lirk P; von Goedecke A
Can J Anaesth; 2004 Oct; 51(8):834-7. PubMed ID: 15470175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the reinforced and standard laryngeal mask airway: ease of insertion and the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure.
Buckham M; Brooker M; Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anaesth Intensive Care; 1999 Dec; 27(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 10631418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the reusable Classic laryngeal mask airway and the single-use Soft Seal laryngeal mask airway.
Hanning SJ; McCulloch TJ; Orr B; Anderson SP
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2006 Apr; 34(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 16617647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
