These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10390032)

  • 1. Motor and perceptual factors in pseudoneglect.
    MacLeod MS; Turnbull OH
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):707-13. PubMed ID: 10390032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Residual perceptual distortion in 'recovered' hemispatial neglect.
    Harvey M; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):745-50. PubMed ID: 10390036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When the whole is more than the sum of the parts: evidence from visuospatial neglect.
    Gallace A; Imbornone E; Vallar G
    J Neuropsychol; 2008 Sep; 2(2):387-413. PubMed ID: 19824178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.
    Jewell G; McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 10617294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lost in the middle. Attentional modulation of the pseudoneglect phenomenon in a "no hands" line bisection paradigm.
    Lavanchy L; Mayer E; Hauert CA
    Cortex; 2004 Feb; 40(1):181-2. PubMed ID: 15174463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple perceptual distortions and their modulation in leftsided visual neglect.
    Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(7):1073-86. PubMed ID: 10775717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemispheric asymmetry and callosal integration of visuospatial attention in schizophrenia: a tachistoscopic line bisection study.
    McCourt ME; Shpaner M; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Jul; 102(1-3):189-96. PubMed ID: 18485672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Categorisation of 'perceptual' and 'premotor' neglect patients across different tasks: is there strong evidence for a dichotomy?
    Harvey M; Krämer-McCaffery T; Dow L; Murphy PJ; Gilchrist ID
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(8):1387-95. PubMed ID: 11931943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monocular patching affects inattention but not perseveration in spatial neglect.
    Khurshid S; Longin H; Crucian GP; Barrett AM
    Neurocase; 2009 Aug; 15(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 19370480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The egocentric reference deviation of neglect patients is influenced by visuospatial attention.
    Richard C; Rousseaux M; Honoré J
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(12):1784-91. PubMed ID: 16154454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Jewell G
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Horizontal space misrepresentation in unilateral brain damage. I. Visual and proprioceptive-motor influences in left unilateral neglect.
    Doricchi F; Galati G; DeLuca L; Nico D; D'Olimpio F
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(8):1107-17. PubMed ID: 11931915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The traffic light paradigm: a reaction time task to study laterally directed arm movements.
    Bartolomeo P
    Brain Res Brain Res Protoc; 2002 Feb; 9(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11852268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Line and word bisection in right-brain-damaged patients with left spatial neglect.
    Veronelli L; Vallar G; Marinelli CV; Primativo S; Arduino LS
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jan; 232(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 24146192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How do patients with neglect see a horizontal line? Analysis of performances in coloured line bisection task.
    Misonou K; Ishiai S; Seki K; Koyama Y; Nakano N
    J Neurol; 2004 Jun; 251(6):696-703. PubMed ID: 15311345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unilateral neglect is not unilateral: evidence for additional neglect of extreme right space.
    Ellis AW; Jordan JL; Sullivan CA
    Cortex; 2006 Aug; 42(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 17131591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociation of neglect subtypes with transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Ghacibeh GA; Shenker JI; Winter KH; Triggs WJ; Heilman KM
    Neurology; 2007 Sep; 69(11):1122-7. PubMed ID: 17846411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual and premotor neglect: is there an ideal task to categorise patients?
    Harvey M
    Cortex; 2004 Apr; 40(2):323-8. PubMed ID: 15156790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The end of the line: Antagonistic attentional weightings in unilateral neglect.
    McIntosh RD
    Cortex; 2018 Oct; 107():220-228. PubMed ID: 28807326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acceleration perception and spatial distortion in a left unilateral neglect patient.
    Geminiani G; Corazzini LL; Stucchi N; Gindri P
    Cortex; 2004 Apr; 40(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 15156789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.