These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. EPA rebuffs challenge to its assessment of dioxin data. Reichardt T Nature; 1994 Sep; 371(6495):272. PubMed ID: 8090187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Science, policy, and trends of metals risk assessment at EPA: how understanding metals bioavailability has changed metals risk assessment at US EPA. Reiley MC Aquat Toxicol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 17662477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. EPA storage-tank rules include many exclusions. Nacht SH Health Facil Manage; 1990 Apr; 3(4):38-40. PubMed ID: 10104102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Federal regulatory assessment approach at the U.S. EPA. Fenner-Crisp P Sci Total Environ; 1990 Dec; 99(3):257-61; discussion 261-2. PubMed ID: 2077658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Climate science. U.S. Supreme Court gets arguments for EPA to regulate CO2. Kintisch E Science; 2006 Sep; 313(5792):1375. PubMed ID: 16959983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The poor condition of the U.S. infrastructure. Charles M IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2008; 27(6):70-1. PubMed ID: 19004699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. OSHA evaluates EPA standard for use of EO gas. Bull Am Coll Surg; 1982 May; 67(5):7, 26. PubMed ID: 10278116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Putting hospitals on notice. Blesch G Mod Healthc; 2010 May; 40(21):1, 6-7, 16. PubMed ID: 20536107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Environmental regulation. New particulate rules are anything but fine, say scientists. Stokstad E Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5757):27. PubMed ID: 16400119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. US aims to tighten rules on direct-to-consumer drug ads. Vastag B Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Mar; 25(3):267. PubMed ID: 17344868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Correct equations for calculating the maximum allowable fish consumption rate for human health risk assessment considering the noncarcinogenic effects of multiple contaminants in fish. Yu Y; Zhang D; Zhang X Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Oct; 46(19):10481-2. PubMed ID: 22989162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. FDA, OSHA, and EPA regulation of the recombinant DNA technology. Korwek EL J Parenter Sci Technol; 1982; 36(6):251-5. PubMed ID: 7161657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [The risk assessment of cancer morbidity in the joint action of carcinogens]. Shaĭkina OI; Shaĭkin AB; Kon'shina LG Gig Sanit; 1999; (1):41-3. PubMed ID: 10199078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Incorporating biologically based models into assessments of risk from chemical contaminants. Bull RJ; Conolly RB; De Marini DM; MacPhail RC; Ohanian EV; Swenberg JA J Am Water Works Assoc; 1993 Mar; 85(3):49-52. PubMed ID: 11538064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. US broadens scientific base of controls on carcinogens. Reichhardt T Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6576):659. PubMed ID: 8614448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]