These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10391620)

  • 1. Attention to facial regions in segmental and prosodic visual speech perception tasks.
    Lansing CR; McConkie GW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Jun; 42(3):526-39. PubMed ID: 10391620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gaze patterns and audiovisual speech enhancement.
    Yi A; Wong W; Eizenman M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):471-80. PubMed ID: 23275394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual speech influences speech perception immediately but not automatically.
    Mitterer H; Reinisch E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):660-678. PubMed ID: 27905070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word Learning in Deaf Adults Who Use Cochlear Implants: The Role of Talker Variability and Attention to the Mouth.
    Hartman J; Saffran J; Litovsky R
    Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):337-350. PubMed ID: 37695563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual scanning patterns of a talking face when evaluating phonetic information in a native and non-native language.
    Deng X; McClay E; Jastrzebski E; Wang Y; Yeung HH
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0304150. PubMed ID: 38805447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audio-visual speech perception off the top of the head.
    Davis C; Kim J
    Cognition; 2006 Jul; 100(3):B21-31. PubMed ID: 16289070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognizing prosody across modalities, face areas and speakers: examining perceivers' sensitivity to variable realizations of visual prosody.
    Cvejic E; Kim J; Davis C
    Cognition; 2012 Mar; 122(3):442-53. PubMed ID: 22196745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of eye gaze on spoken word processing: an ERP study with infants.
    Parise E; Handl A; Palumbo L; Friederici AD
    Child Dev; 2011; 82(3):842-53. PubMed ID: 21410929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Word identification and eye fixation locations in visual and visual-plus-auditory presentations of spoken sentences.
    Lansing CR; McConkie GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 May; 65(4):536-52. PubMed ID: 12812277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. You talkin' to me? Communicative talker gaze activates left-lateralized superior temporal cortex during perception of degraded speech.
    McGettigan C; Jasmin K; Eisner F; Agnew ZK; Josephs OJ; Calder AJ; Jessop R; Lawson RP; Spielmann M; Scott SK
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jun; 100():51-63. PubMed ID: 28400328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eye fixations of deaf and hearing observers in simultaneous communication perception.
    De Filippo CL; Lansing CR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):331-52. PubMed ID: 16825884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial Frequency Requirements and Gaze Strategy in Visual-Only and Audiovisual Speech Perception.
    Wilson AH; Alsius A; Paré M; Munhall KG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Aug; 59(4):601-15. PubMed ID: 27537379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The redeployment of attention to the mouth of a talking face during the second year of life.
    Hillairet de Boisferon A; Tift AH; Minar NJ; Lewkowicz DJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Aug; 172():189-200. PubMed ID: 29627481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences.
    Grant KW; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1197-208. PubMed ID: 11008820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When half a face is as good as a whole: effects of simple substantial occlusion on visual and audiovisual speech perception.
    Jordan TR; Thomas SM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2270-85. PubMed ID: 21842332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contributions of oral and extraoral facial movement to visual and audiovisual speech perception.
    Thomas SM; Jordan TR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):873-88. PubMed ID: 15462626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Making predictable unpredictable with style - Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the critical role of prosodic expectations in the perception of prominence in speech.
    Kakouros S; Salminen N; Räsänen O
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():181-199. PubMed ID: 29247667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mouth and Voice: A Relationship between Visual and Auditory Preference in the Human Superior Temporal Sulcus.
    Zhu LL; Beauchamp MS
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(10):2697-2708. PubMed ID: 28179553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Look who's talking!" Gaze Patterns for Implicit and Explicit Audio-Visual Speech Synchrony Detection in Children With High-Functioning Autism.
    Grossman RB; Steinhart E; Mitchell T; McIlvane W
    Autism Res; 2015 Jun; 8(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 25620208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.