BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

667 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10391809)

  • 1. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.
    Burman ML; Taplin SH; Herta DF; Elmore JG
    Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 131(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10391809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of false-positive mammograms on return for subsequent screening mammography.
    Pinckney RG; Geller BM; Burman M; Littenberg B
    Am J Med; 2003 Feb; 114(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 12586231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms.
    Christiansen CL; Wang F; Barton MB; Kreuter W; Elmore JG; Gelfand AE; Fletcher SW
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Oct; 92(20):1657-66. PubMed ID: 11036111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false-positive findings.
    Lehman CD; White E; Peacock S; Drucker MJ; Urban N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1651-5. PubMed ID: 10584815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms: clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits.
    Barton MB; Moore S; Polk S; Shtatland E; Elmore JG; Fletcher SW
    J Gen Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 16(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 11318909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.
    Mandelson MT; Oestreicher N; Porter PL; White D; Finder CA; Taplin SH; White E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Jul; 92(13):1081-7. PubMed ID: 10880551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of false-positive screening mammograms on rescreening in Western Australia.
    Sim MJ; Siva SP; Ramli IS; Fritschi L; Tresham J; Wylie EJ
    Med J Aust; 2012 Jun; 196(11):693-5. PubMed ID: 22708767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
    Dabbous FM; Dolecek TA; Berbaum ML; Friedewald SM; Summerfelt WT; Hoskins K; Rauscher GH
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Mar; 26(3):397-403. PubMed ID: 28183826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial.
    Barton MB; Morley DS; Moore S; Allen JD; Kleinman KP; Emmons KM; Fletcher SW
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Apr; 96(7):529-38. PubMed ID: 15069115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
    Elmore JG; Barton MB; Moceri VM; Polk S; Arena PJ; Fletcher SW
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Apr; 338(16):1089-96. PubMed ID: 9545356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compliance With Screening Mammography Guidelines After a False-Positive Mammogram.
    Hardesty LA; Lind KE; Gutierrez EJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1032-8. PubMed ID: 27233908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance.
    Brett J; Austoker J
    J Public Health Med; 2001 Dec; 23(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 11873891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms.
    Brewer NT; Salz T; Lillie SE
    Ann Intern Med; 2007 Apr; 146(7):502-10. PubMed ID: 17404352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening mammography behavior after a false positive mammogram.
    Pisano ED; Earp JA; Gallant TL
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1998; 22(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 9544437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
    White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
    Yasmeen S; Romano PS; Pettinger M; Chlebowski RT; Robbins JA; Lane DS; Hendrix SL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 12644536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biennial screening mammography: How many women ask for more? Estimate of the interval mammogram rate in an organised population-based screening programme.
    Carbonaro LA; Rizzo SS; Schiaffino S; Pisani Mainini A; Berger N; Trimboli RM; Sardanelli F
    Radiol Med; 2021 Feb; 126(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 32577906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of false-positives and women's characteristics on long-term adherence to breast cancer screening.
    Román R; Sala M; De La Vega M; Natal C; Galceran J; González-Román I; Baroja A; Zubizarreta R; Ascunce N; Salas D; Castells X
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Nov; 130(2):543-52. PubMed ID: 21617920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of false-positive results on reattendance at breast cancer screening programmes in Spain.
    Alamo-Junquera D; Murta-Nascimento C; Macià F; Baré M; Galcerán J; Ascunce N; Zubizarreta R; Salas D; Román R; Castells X; Sala M;
    Eur J Public Health; 2012 Jun; 22(3):404-8. PubMed ID: 21558152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overuse of mammography during the first round of an organized breast cancer screening programme.
    Chamot E; Charvet A; Perneger TV
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Aug; 15(4):620-5. PubMed ID: 19522725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.