1105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10392823)
1. Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with Ct-option.
Verellen D; Vinh-Hung V; Bijdekerke P; Nijs F; Linthout N; Bel A; Storme G
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Mar; 50(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 10392823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the impact of extended field-of-view CT reconstructions on CT values and dosimetric accuracy for radiation therapy.
Cheung JP; Shugard E; Mistry N; Pouliot J; Chen J
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):892-901. PubMed ID: 30457170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric impact of image artifact from a wide-bore CT scanner in radiotherapy treatment planning.
Wu V; Podgorsak MB; Tran TA; Malhotra HK; Wang IZ
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4451-63. PubMed ID: 21859046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.
Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technical assessment of a mobile CT scanner for image-guided brachytherapy.
Chernavsky NE; Morcos M; Wu P; Viswanathan AN; Siewerdsen JH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):187-200. PubMed ID: 31578811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the variation in CT scanner performance (image quality and Hounsfield units) with scan parameters, for image optimisation in radiotherapy treatment planning.
Davis AT; Palmer AL; Pani S; Nisbet A
Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():59-64. PubMed ID: 29472091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applications of simulator computed tomography number for photon dose calculations during radiotherapy treatment planning.
Chu JC; Ni B; Kriz R; Amod Saxena V
Radiother Oncol; 2000 Apr; 55(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 10788690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of the usability of conebeam CT data sets for dose calculation.
Richter A; Hu Q; Steglich D; Baier K; Wilbert J; Guckenberger M; Flentje M
Radiat Oncol; 2008 Dec; 3():42. PubMed ID: 19087250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation into image quality and dose for different patient geometries with multiple cone-beam CT systems.
Gardner SJ; Studenski MT; Giaddui T; Cui Y; Galvin J; Yu Y; Xiao Y
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031908. PubMed ID: 24593726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the effects of variation in CT scanning parameters on the image quality and Hounsfield units for optimization of dose in radiotherapy treatment planning: A semi-anthropomorphic thorax phantom study.
Sorooshfard E; Tahmasbi M; Chegeni N; Tahmasebi Birgani MJ
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023; 19(2):426-434. PubMed ID: 37006077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Initial implementation of the conversion from the energy-subtracted CT number to electron density in tissue inhomogeneity corrections: an anthropomorphic phantom study of radiotherapy treatment planning.
Tsukihara M; Noto Y; Sasamoto R; Hayakawa T; Saito M
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1378-88. PubMed ID: 25735292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes realized from extended bit-depth and metal artifact reduction in CT.
Glide-Hurst C; Chen D; Zhong H; Chetty IJ
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061711. PubMed ID: 23718590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image quality and absorbed dose comparison of single- and dual-source cone-beam computed tomography.
Miura H; Ozawa S; Okazue T; Kawakubo A; Yamada K; Nagata Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 29667294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.
Jaffray DA; Siewerdsen JH; Wong JW; Martinez AA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Aug; 53(5):1337-49. PubMed ID: 12128137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
