BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10393490)

  • 1. What randomized trials and systematic reviews can offer decision makers.
    Altman DG
    Horm Res; 1999; 51 Suppl 1():36-43. PubMed ID: 10393490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [How to assess the quality of systematic review and meta-analysis].
    Zhang JH; Shang HC; Zhang BL
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Apr; 6(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 18405597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A methodological review of recent meta-analyses has found significant heterogeneity in age between randomized groups.
    Clark L; Fairhurst C; Hewitt CE; Birks Y; Brabyn S; Cockayne S; Rodgers S; Hicks K; Hodgson R; Littlewood E; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 67(9):1016-24. PubMed ID: 24909873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine.
    Smyth RL
    Paediatr Respir Rev; 2000 Sep; 1(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 12531092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some methodological points to consider when performing systematic reviews in comparative effectiveness research.
    Berlin JA; Cepeda MS
    Clin Trials; 2012 Feb; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 22049086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.
    Burton M; Clarke M
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):101-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16442423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence based evaluation of immuno-coagulatory interventions in critical care.
    Afshari A
    Dan Med Bull; 2011 Sep; 58(9):B4316. PubMed ID: 21893014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factorial design provides evidence to guide practice of anaesthesia.
    Korttila K; Apfel CC
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Aug; 49(7):927-9. PubMed ID: 16045652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit.
    Bassler D; Ferreira-Gonzalez I; Briel M; Cook DJ; Devereaux PJ; Heels-Ansdell D; Kirpalani H; Meade MO; Montori VM; Rozenberg A; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):869-73. PubMed ID: 17689802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: the need for complete data.
    Clarke MJ; Stewart LA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Nov; 1(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 9238566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based pediatric pulmonary medicine: how can it help?
    Smyth RL
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 1998 Feb; 25(2):118-27. PubMed ID: 9516096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with a focus on drug safety: an empirical assessment.
    Hammad TA; Neyarapally GA; Pinheiro SP; Iyasu S; Rochester G; Dal Pan G
    Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 23508987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews.
    Jadad AR; Cook DJ; Browman GP
    CMAJ; 1997 May; 156(10):1411-6. PubMed ID: 9164400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in surgery].
    Diener MK; Seiler CM; Antes G
    Chirurg; 2007 Oct; 78(10):938-44. PubMed ID: 17805496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Askie L; Offringa M
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Dec; 20(6):403-9. PubMed ID: 26515266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic reviews and their application to research in speech and language therapy: a response to T. R. Pring's 'Ask a silly question: two decades of troublesome trials' (2004).
    Garrett Z; Thomas J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2006; 41(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 16272005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.