These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

530 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10393585)

  • 1. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the debonding characteristics of 2 ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Theodorakopoulou LP; Sadowsky PL; Jacobson A; Lacefield W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Mar; 125(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 15014410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.
    Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro evaluation of a metal reinforced orthodontic ceramic bracket.
    Mundstock KS; Sadowsky PL; Lacefield W; Bae S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 10587597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of different ceramic bracket base designs.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9188961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
    Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks.
    Bishara SE; Fonseca JM; Boyer DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 7661139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Debonding forces applied to ceramic brackets simulating clinical conditions.
    Bishara SE; Forrseca JM; Fehr DE; Boyer DB
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 7978522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons of shear bond strength of precoated and uncoated brackets.
    Bishara SE; Olsen M; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):617-21. PubMed ID: 9423693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
    Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An easily removable ceramic bracket?
    Fox NA; McCabe JF
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Nov; 19(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 1463706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
    Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The extent of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermally debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal brackets by energy dispersive micro- and image-analysis.
    Stratmann U; Schaarschmidt K; Wegener H; Ehmer U
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 9009430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs.
    Bordeaux JM; Moore RN; Bagby MD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jun; 105(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 8198079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparisons of the effectiveness of pliers with narrow and wide blades in debonding ceramic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Fehr DE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Mar; 103(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 8456783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The force levels required to mechanically debond ceramic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
    Arici S; Minors C
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 22(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 10920565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.